Re: [PATCH 0/2] Remove kiocb ki_complete

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:17:05AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I really don't like this series at all.  If saves a single pointer
> but introduces a complicated machinery that just doesn't follow any
> natural flow.  And there doesn't seem to be any good reason for it to
> start with.

Jens doesn't want the kiocb to grow beyond a single cacheline, and we
want the ability to set the loff_t in userspace for an appending write,
so the plan was to replace the ki_complete member in kiocb with an
loff_t __user *ki_posp.

I don't think it's worth worrying about growing kiocb, personally,
but this seemed like the easiest way to make room for a new pointer.