Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.7 37/53] cifs: Fix double add page to memcg when cifs_readpages

From: Sasha Levin
Date: Thu Jul 09 2020 - 19:49:43 EST


On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 09:08:45AM -0700, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
ÑÑ, 1 ÐÑÐ. 2020 Ð. Ð 18:35, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>:

From: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 95a3d8f3af9b0d63b43f221b630beaab9739d13a ]

When xfstests generic/451, there is an BUG at mm/memcontrol.c:
page:ffffea000560f2c0 refcount:2 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008544e0ea
index:0xf
mapping->aops:cifs_addr_ops dentry name:"tst-aio-dio-cycle-write.451"
flags: 0x2fffff80000001(locked)
raw: 002fffff80000001 ffffc90002023c50 ffffea0005280088 ffff88815cda0210
raw: 000000000000000f 0000000000000000 00000002ffffffff ffff88817287d000
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->mem_cgroup)
page->mem_cgroup:ffff88817287d000
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at mm/memcontrol.c:2659!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 PID: 2038 Comm: xfs_io Not tainted 5.8.0-rc1 #44
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ?-20190727_
073836-buildvm-ppc64le-16.ppc.4
RIP: 0010:commit_charge+0x35/0x50
Code: 0d 48 83 05 54 b2 02 05 01 48 89 77 38 c3 48 c7
c6 78 4a ea ba 48 83 05 38 b2 02 05 01 e8 63 0d9
RSP: 0018:ffffc90002023a50 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88817287d000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88817ac97ea0 RDI: ffff88817ac97ea0
RBP: ffffea000560f2c0 R08: 0000000000000203 R09: 0000000000000005
R10: 0000000000000030 R11: ffffc900020237a8 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88815a1272c0
FS: 00007f5071ab0800(0000) GS:ffff88817ac80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055efcd5ca000 CR3: 000000015d312000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
mem_cgroup_charge+0x166/0x4f0
__add_to_page_cache_locked+0x4a9/0x710
add_to_page_cache_locked+0x15/0x20
cifs_readpages+0x217/0x1270
read_pages+0x29a/0x670
page_cache_readahead_unbounded+0x24f/0x390
__do_page_cache_readahead+0x3f/0x60
ondemand_readahead+0x1f1/0x470
page_cache_async_readahead+0x14c/0x170
generic_file_buffered_read+0x5df/0x1100
generic_file_read_iter+0x10c/0x1d0
cifs_strict_readv+0x139/0x170
new_sync_read+0x164/0x250
__vfs_read+0x39/0x60
vfs_read+0xb5/0x1e0
ksys_pread64+0x85/0xf0
__x64_sys_pread64+0x22/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x69/0x150
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x7f5071fcb1af
Code: Bad RIP value.
RSP: 002b:00007ffde2cdb8e0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000011
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffde2cdb990 RCX: 00007f5071fcb1af
RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 000055efcd5ca000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 000000000009f000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000001000
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 725fa14a3e1af65c ]---

Since commit 3fea5a499d57 ("mm: memcontrol: convert page cache to a new
mem_cgroup_charge() API") not cancel the page charge, the pages maybe
double add to pagecache:
thread1 | thread2
cifs_readpages
readpages_get_pages
add_to_page_cache_locked(head,index=n)=0
| readpages_get_pages
| add_to_page_cache_locked(head,index=n+1)=0
add_to_page_cache_locked(head, index=n+1)=-EEXIST
then, will next loop with list head page's
index=n+1 and the page->mapping not NULL
readpages_get_pages
add_to_page_cache_locked(head, index=n+1)
commit_charge
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE

So, we should not do the next loop when any page add to page cache
failed.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Sasha,

The patch description mentions the commit 3fea5a499d57 that changed
the behavior and was introduced in v5.8-rc1. I noticed that you are
targeting this patch for 4.9, 4.14, 4.19, 5.4 and 5.7 stable branches.
Are you going to backport the commit 3fea5a499d57 as well?

Nope, I'll drop this one. Thanks!

--
Thanks,
Sasha