Re: [PATCH v8 2/6] IIO: Ingenic JZ47xx: Error check clk_enable calls.

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Mon Jul 13 2020 - 07:22:03 EST


On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:07:44 +0000
"Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 13:02 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:21:56 +0200
> > Artur Rojek <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Introduce error checks for the clk_enable calls used in this driver.
> > > As part of the changes, move clk_enable/clk_disable calls out of
> > > ingenic_adc_set_config and into respective logic of its callers.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Artur Rojek <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Tested-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Applied.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes:
> > >
> > > v6: new patch
> > >
> > > v7: no change
> > >
> > > v8: move `clk_disable` outside the lock
> > >
> > > drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-
> > > adc.c
> > > index 39c0a609fc94..c1946a9f1cca 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ingenic-adc.c
> > > @@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ static void ingenic_adc_set_config(struct ingenic_adc
> > > *adc,
> > > {
> > > uint32_t cfg;
> > >
> > > - clk_enable(adc->clk);
> > > mutex_lock(&adc->lock);
> > >
> > > cfg = readl(adc->base + JZ_ADC_REG_CFG) & ~mask;
> > > @@ -81,7 +80,6 @@ static void ingenic_adc_set_config(struct ingenic_adc
> > > *adc,
> > > writel(cfg, adc->base + JZ_ADC_REG_CFG);
> > >
> > > mutex_unlock(&adc->lock);
> > > - clk_disable(adc->clk);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void ingenic_adc_enable(struct ingenic_adc *adc,
> > > @@ -124,6 +122,8 @@ static int ingenic_adc_write_raw(struct iio_dev
> > > *iio_dev,
> > > long m)
> > > {
> > > struct ingenic_adc *adc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> > > + struct device *dev = iio_dev->dev.parent;
> > > + int ret;
> > >
> > > switch (m) {
> > > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> > > @@ -131,6 +131,14 @@ static int ingenic_adc_write_raw(struct iio_dev
> > > *iio_dev,
> > > case INGENIC_ADC_BATTERY:
> > > if (!adc->soc_data->battery_vref_mode)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + ret = clk_enable(adc->clk);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clock:
> > > %d\n",
> > > + ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (val > JZ_ADC_BATTERY_LOW_VREF) {
> > > ingenic_adc_set_config(adc,
> > > JZ_ADC_REG_CFG_BAT_M
> > > D,
> > > @@ -142,6 +150,9 @@ static int ingenic_adc_write_raw(struct iio_dev
> > > *iio_dev,
> > > JZ_ADC_REG_CFG_BAT_M
> > > D);
> > > adc->low_vref_mode = true;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + clk_disable(adc->clk);
> > > +
> > > return 0;
> > > default:
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -317,6 +328,13 @@ static int ingenic_adc_read_chan_info_raw(struct
> > > ingenic_adc *adc,
> > > int *val)
> > > {
> > > int bit, ret, engine = (chan->channel == INGENIC_ADC_BATTERY);
> > > + struct device *dev = iio_priv_to_dev(adc)->dev.parent;
>
> This uses iio_priv_to_dev(), which should be removed [if it hasn't been
> already].

Gah I missed that.
For now best bet is probably if I drop this series from here on until we have
this tidied up in a v9. Its my fault as I messed up and lost one patch in
the middle of Alex's series somehow, hence it is still there but broken in
the tree.

Thanks.

Jonathan

> Also, with the iio_dev_opaque struct/type, using the iio_priv_to_dev()
> helper shouldn't work, or should give undefined behavior, as the offset to
> the private data should be matched against iio_dev_opaque (and not
> iio_dev).
>
> Looking at this code, it looks like ingenic_adc_read_chan_info_raw() can
> take an 'indio_dev' reference and obtain the private information via
> iio_priv()
>
> Maybe [for some] there's a question as to why iio_priv_to_dev() is being
> removed.
> The answer is: because the iio_dev_opaque struct/type was introduced to
> hide some iio_dev [INTERN] fields; the main reason for hiding them [aside
> from good coding practice, and because they belong to the IIO framework] is
> to not have to review new drivers being copied/adapted from old drivers.
>
> Naturally, the iio_priv_to_dev() could have been kept around [in a reworked
> form], but it didn't make much sense, since most users of iio_priv_to_dev()
> could access a reference to indio_dev without much/any hassle.
>
> > > +
> > > + ret = clk_enable(adc->clk);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clock: %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > /* We cannot sample AUX/AUX2 in parallel. */
> > > mutex_lock(&adc->aux_lock);
> > > @@ -325,7 +343,6 @@ static int ingenic_adc_read_chan_info_raw(struct
> > > ingenic_adc *adc,
> > > ingenic_adc_set_config(adc, JZ_ADC_REG_CFG_AUX_MD, bit);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - clk_enable(adc->clk);
> > > ret = ingenic_adc_capture(adc, engine);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto out;
> > > @@ -342,8 +359,8 @@ static int ingenic_adc_read_chan_info_raw(struct
> > > ingenic_adc *adc,
> > >
> > > ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> > > out:
> > > - clk_disable(adc->clk);
> > > mutex_unlock(&adc->aux_lock);
> > > + clk_disable(adc->clk);
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }