Re: [PATCH v3 07/19] vhost: Remove redundant use of read_barrier_depends() barrier

From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Mon Jul 13 2020 - 07:27:13 EST


On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 05:51:51PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Since commit 76ebbe78f739 ("locking/barriers: Add implicit
> smp_read_barrier_depends() to READ_ONCE()"), there is no need to use
> smp_read_barrier_depends() outside of the Alpha architecture code.
>
> Unfortunately, there is precisely _one_ user in the vhost code, and
> there isn't an obvious READ_ONCE() access making the barrier
> redundant. However, on closer inspection (thanks, Jason), it appears
> that vring synchronisation between the producer and consumer occurs via
> the 'avail_idx' field, which is followed up by an rmb() in
> vhost_get_vq_desc(), making the read_barrier_depends() redundant on
> Alpha.
>
> Jason says:
>
> | I'm also confused about the barrier here, basically in driver side
> | we did:
> |
> | 1) allocate pages
> | 2) store pages in indirect->addr
> | 3) smp_wmb()
> | 4) increase the avail idx (somehow a tail pointer of vring)
> |
> | in vhost we did:
> |
> | 1) read avail idx
> | 2) smp_rmb()
> | 3) read indirect->addr
> | 4) read from indirect->addr
> |
> | It looks to me even the data dependency barrier is not necessary
> | since we have rmb() which is sufficient for us to the correct
> | indirect->addr and driver are not expected to do any writing to
> | indirect->addr after avail idx is increased
>
> Remove the redundant barrier invocation.
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>


I agree

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>

Pls merge with the rest of the patchset.

> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index d7b8df3edffc..74d135ee7e26 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -2092,11 +2092,6 @@ static int get_indirect(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> return ret;
> }
> iov_iter_init(&from, READ, vq->indirect, ret, len);
> -
> - /* We will use the result as an address to read from, so most
> - * architectures only need a compiler barrier here. */
> - read_barrier_depends();
> -
> count = len / sizeof desc;
> /* Buffers are chained via a 16 bit next field, so
> * we can have at most 2^16 of these. */
> --
> 2.27.0.383.g050319c2ae-goog