[PATCH 5.7 136/166] btrfs: discard: add missing put when grabbing block group from unused list

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>

commit 04e484c5973ed0f9234c97685c3c5e1ebf0d6eb6 upstream.

[BUG]
The following small test script can trigger ASSERT() at unmount time:

  mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
  mount $dev $mnt
  mount -o remount,discard=async $mnt
  umount $mnt

The call trace:
  assertion failed: atomic_read(&block_group->count) == 1, in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3431
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3204!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 4 PID: 10389 Comm: umount Tainted: G           O      5.8.0-rc3-custom+ #68
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  Call Trace:
   btrfs_free_block_groups.cold+0x22/0x55 [btrfs]
   close_ctree+0x2cb/0x323 [btrfs]
   btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
   generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110
   kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30
   btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x30 [btrfs]
   deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0xa0
   deactivate_super+0x40/0x50
   cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x190
   __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20
   task_work_run+0x64/0xb0
   __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bc/0x1c0
   __syscall_return_slowpath+0x47/0x230
   do_syscall_64+0x64/0xb0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The code:
                ASSERT(atomic_read(&block_group->count) == 1);
                btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);

[CAUSE]
Obviously it's some btrfs_get_block_group() call doesn't get its put
call.

The offending btrfs_get_block_group() happens here:

  void btrfs_mark_bg_unused(struct btrfs_block_group *bg)
  {
  	if (list_empty(&bg->bg_list)) {
  		btrfs_get_block_group(bg);
		list_add_tail(&bg->bg_list, &fs_info->unused_bgs);
  	}
  }

So every call sites removing the block group from unused_bgs list should
reduce the ref count of that block group.

However for async discard, it didn't follow the call convention:

  void btrfs_discard_punt_unused_bgs_list(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
  {
  	list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, next, &fs_info->unused_bgs,
  				 bg_list) {
  		list_del_init(&block_group->bg_list);
  		btrfs_discard_queue_work(&fs_info->discard_ctl, block_group);
  	}
  }

And in btrfs_discard_queue_work(), it doesn't call
btrfs_put_block_group() either.

[FIX]
Fix the problem by reducing the reference count when we grab the block
group from unused_bgs list.

Reported-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 6e80d4f8c422 ("btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.6+
Tested-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/btrfs/discard.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/discard.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/discard.c
@@ -619,6 +619,7 @@ void btrfs_discard_punt_unused_bgs_list(
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(block_group, next, &fs_info->unused_bgs,
 				 bg_list) {
 		list_del_init(&block_group->bg_list);
+		btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
 		btrfs_discard_queue_work(&fs_info->discard_ctl, block_group);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);