Re: [PATCH 0/2] X32 syscall cleanups

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:03 AM Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 2:40 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23:13AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > > Christoph Hellwig uncovered an issue with how we currently handle X32
> > > syscalls.  Currently, we can only use COMPAT_SYS_DEFINEx() for X32
> > > specific syscalls.  These changes remove that restriction and allow
> > > native syscalls.
> >
> > Did this go anywhere?
>
> This approach wasn't well received, so I'd just go with this as the
> simplest solution:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a17h782gO65qJ9Mmz0EuiTSKQPEyr_=nvqOtnmQZuh9Kw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>

I'm okay with either approach, although I think the original approach
is nicer than the simplified #define approach.

In my mind, the __x64_omg_so_many_underscores prefixes really mean
"don't think too hard about these -- we just decided to make extra
long names", so whatever.  We can clean it up more some day.

> --
> Brian Gerst