Re: [PATCH 0/2] Update CascadelakeX and SkylakeX events list

[Jin, Yao]

Hi,

On 6/17/2020 3:38 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 02:27:40PM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:
> > On 6/16/2020 2:16 PM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Jin, Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Can I get an ACK for this patchset?
> > > > On 6/3/2020 10:18 AM, Jin Yao wrote:
> > > > > This patchset updates CascadelakeX events to v1.08 and
> > > > > updates SkylakeX events to v1.21.
>
> > > > > The events have been tested on CascadelakeX and SkylakeX
> > > > > servers with latest perf/core branch.
>
> > > could you rebase this on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core tree?
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=tmp.perf/core
> > > I tried using git am but get:
> > > Applying: perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
> > > error: patch fragment without header at line 279: @@ -213,14 +220,14 @@
> > > error: could not build fake ancestor
> > > Patch failed at 0001 perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ian
> >
> > The patchset are applied OK on perf/core branch.
> >
> > As far as I understand, the patch for posting should be based on perf/core branch, is it right?
>
> Sorry, I've been testing with using tmp.perf/core as a way to more
> quickly make available what I've processed, before I test it thoroughly
> both with container builds and with manual testing, so the bleeding edge
> is there, perf/core becoming a bit more stable, as I'll try not to
> rebase it like before.
>
> - Arnaldo

Can this event update be accepted?

Thanks
Jin Yao