Re: [PATCH] pwm: bcm-iproc: handle clk_get_rate() return

From: Scott Branden
Date: Fri Jul 17 2020 - 14:24:54 EST




On 2020-07-17 10:22 a.m., Ray Jui wrote:

On 7/17/2020 10:07 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
From: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Handle clk_get_rate() returning <= 0 condition to avoid
possible division by zero.

Fixes: daa5abc41c80 ("pwm: Add support for Broadcom iProc PWM controller")
Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
index 1f829edd8ee7..72a8607b6c8d 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-iproc.c
@@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ static void iproc_pwmc_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
u32 value, prescale;
rate = clk_get_rate(ip->clk);
+ if (rate == 0) {
+ state->period = 0;
+ state->duty_cycle = 0;
+ return;
+ }
I'll move the logic after the polarity and enabled fields are populated.
Based on the pwm core code, 'get_state' expects the following fields to
be populated: 'polarity', 'enabled', 'period', and 'duty cycle'.

The above logic will leave 'polarity' and 'enabled' completely
unpopulated when clock rate is zero.

value = readl(ip->base + IPROC_PWM_CTRL_OFFSET);