Re: [PATCH v2] drm/virtio: Fix memory leak in virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl()

From: Markus Elfring
Date: Mon Jul 20 2020 - 11:29:17 EST

Next message: Joerg Roedel: "Re: [PATCH v4 70/75] x86/head/64: Don't call verify_cpu() on starting APs"
Previous message: Peter Maydell: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] syscalls: use uaccess_kernel in addr_limit_user_check"
In reply to: hexin: "[PATCH v2] drm/virtio: fixed memory leak in virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> â To balance the reference
> count initialized when allocating fence, dma_fence_put()
> should not be deleted.

* Would an imperative wording be more appropriate for the change description?

* Is the information âhexinâ sufficient for a real name?

Regards,
Markus

Next message: Joerg Roedel: "Re: [PATCH v4 70/75] x86/head/64: Don't call verify_cpu() on starting APs"
Previous message: Peter Maydell: "Re: [PATCH 1/6] syscalls: use uaccess_kernel in addr_limit_user_check"
In reply to: hexin: "[PATCH v2] drm/virtio: fixed memory leak in virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]