Re: [PATCH v15 7/9] nvmet-passthru: Add passthru code to process commands

[Logan Gunthorpe]

Thanks for the review Christoph. I think I should be able to make all
the requested changes in the next week or two.

On 2020-07-20 1:35 p.m., Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
>> I'm still not so happy about having to look up the namespace and still
>> wonder if we should generalize the connect_q to a passthrough_q.  But
>> I guess we can do that later and then reduce some of the exports here..
> 
> That is a neat idea! should be easy to do (and we can then lose the host
> xarray stuff). I don't mind having it on a later patch, but it should be
> easy enough to do even before...
> 

I sort of follow this. I can try to work something up but it will
probably take me a few iterations to get it to where you want it. So,
roughly, we'd create a passthrough_q in core with the controller's IO
tagset and then cleanup the fabrics hosts to use that instead of each
independently creating their connect_q?

Though, I don't understand how this relates to the host xarray stuff
that Sagi mentioned...

Logan