Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm/hugetlb.c: make is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned return bool

[David Hildenbrand]

On 20.07.20 08:26, Baoquan He wrote:
> Just like his neighbour is_hugetlb_entry_migration() has done.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 191a585bb315..a58f976a9dd9 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3754,17 +3754,17 @@ bool is_hugetlb_entry_migration(pte_t pte)
>  		return false;
>  }
>  
> -static int is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte_t pte)
> +static bool is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	swp_entry_t swp;
>  
>  	if (huge_pte_none(pte) || pte_present(pte))
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  	swp = pte_to_swp_entry(pte);
>  	if (non_swap_entry(swp) && is_hwpoison_entry(swp))
> -		return 1;
> +		return true;
>  	else
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  }
>  
>  int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb