Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: intel-spi: Simulate WRDI command

[Alexander Sverdlin]

Hi!

On 22/07/2020 17:18, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

[...]

>>>> After spi_nor_write_disable() return code checks were introduced in the
>>>> spi-nor front end intel-spi backend stopped to work because WRDI was never
>>>> supported and always failed.
>>>>
>>>> Just pretend it was sucessful and ignore the command itself. HW sequencer
>>>> shall do the right thing automatically, while with SW sequencer we cannot
>>>> do it anyway, because the only tool we had was preopcode and it makes no
>>>> sense for WRDI.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Fixes: bce679e5ae3a ("mtd: spi-nor: Check for errors after each Register Operation")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c
>>>> index 61d2a0a..134b356 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/intel-spi.c
>>>> @@ -612,6 +612,14 @@ static int intel_spi_write_reg(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, const u8 *buf,
>>>>                 return 0;
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>> +       /*
>>>> +        * We hope that HW sequencer will do the right thing automatically and
>>>> +        * with the SW seuencer we cannot use preopcode any way, so just ignore
>>                            ^^^^^^^^
>> Typo, should be sequencer.
>>
>> Otherwise looks good to me.
>>
> It looks good to me too. Should I add your R-b tag when applying?
> I can fix the typo.

Thank you, Mika, Tudor!

-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.