Re: [RFC PATCH] net: dsa: qca8k: Add 802.1q VLAN support

[Jonathan McDowell]

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:26:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 7/21/20 10:16 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > This adds full 802.1q VLAN support to the qca8k, allowing the use of
> > vlan_filtering and more complicated bridging setups than allowed by
> > basic port VLAN support.
> > 
> > Tested with a number of untagged ports with separate VLANs and then a
> > trunk port with all the VLANs tagged on it.
> 
> This looks good to me at first glance, at least not seeing obvious
> issue, however below are a few questions:

Thanks for the comments.

> - vid == 0 appears to be unsupported according to your port_vlan_prepare
> callback, is this really the case, or is it more a case of VID 0 should
> be pvid untagged, which is what dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid() would
> attempt to program

I don't quite follow you here. VID 0 doesn't appear to be supported by
the hardware (and several other DSA drivers don't seem to like it
either), hence the check; I'm not clear if there's something alternate I
should be doing in that case instead?

> - since we have a qca8k_port_bridge_join() callback which programs the
> port lookup control register, putting all ports by default in VID==1
> does not break per-port isolation between non-bridged and bridged ports,
> right?

VLAN_MODE_NONE (set when we don't have VLAN filtering enabled)
configures us for port filtering, ignoring the VLAN info, so I think
we're good here.

> - since you program the ports with a default VLAN ID upon startup of the
> switch driver should not you also set
> dsa_switch::configure_vlan_while_not_filtering to indicate to the DSA
> layer that there is a VLAN table programmed regardless of VLAN filtering
> being enabled in the bridge or not?

Yup, this should be set. I'd seen the vlan_bridge_vtu patch from
December but not noticed it had been renamed, just assumed it hadn't
been applied.

> See some nitpicks below:
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c b/drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c
> > index a5566de82853..cce05493075f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/qca8k.c
> > @@ -408,6 +408,104 @@ qca8k_fdb_flush(struct qca8k_priv *priv)
> >  	mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int
> > +qca8k_vlan_access(struct qca8k_priv *priv, enum qca8k_vlan_cmd cmd, u16 vid)
> > +{
> > +	u32 reg;
> > +
> > +	/* Set the command and VLAN index */
> > +	reg = QCA8K_VTU_FUNC1_BUSY;> +	reg |= cmd;
> > +	reg |= vid << QCA8K_VTU_FUNC1_VID_S;
> > +
> > +	/* Write the function register triggering the table access */
> > +	qca8k_write(priv, QCA8K_REG_VTU_FUNC1, reg);
> > +
> > +	/* wait for completion */
> > +	if (qca8k_busy_wait(priv, QCA8K_REG_VTU_FUNC1, QCA8K_VTU_FUNC1_BUSY))
> > +		return -1;
> 
> Can you propagate the return value from qca8k_busy_wait() directly?

It just returns a boolean. rmk makes a valid point about a sensible
errno instead, so I'll switch to ETIMEDOUT in v2 (and ENOMEM when the
VLAN table is full below).

> > +
> > +	/* Check for table full violation when adding an entry */
> > +	if (cmd == QCA8K_VLAN_LOAD) {
> > +		reg = qca8k_read(priv, QCA8K_REG_VTU_FUNC1);
> > +		if (reg & QCA8K_VTU_FUNC1_FULL)
> > +			return -1;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +qca8k_vlan_add(struct qca8k_priv *priv, u8 port, u16 vid, bool tagged)
> > +{
> > +	u32 reg;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (!vid)
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> > +	ret = qca8k_vlan_access(priv, QCA8K_VLAN_READ, vid);
> > +	if (ret >= 0) {
> 
> Do an early return upon negative error code instead of reidenting the
> code block?

I'll switch over to a goto for cleanup (unlocking the mutex) to avoid
the extra indentation (and below).

> > +		reg = qca8k_read(priv, QCA8K_REG_VTU_FUNC0);
> > +		reg |= QCA8K_VTU_FUNC0_VALID | QCA8K_VTU_FUNC0_IVL_EN;
> > +		reg &= ~(3 << QCA8K_VTU_FUNC0_EG_MODE_S(port));
> > +		if (tagged)
> > +			reg |= QCA8K_VTU_FUNC0_EG_MODE_TAG <<
> > +					QCA8K_VTU_FUNC0_EG_MODE_S(port);
> > +		else
> > +			reg |= QCA8K_VTU_FUNC0_EG_MODE_UNTAG <<
> > +					QCA8K_VTU_FUNC0_EG_MODE_S(port);
> > +
> > +		qca8k_write(priv, QCA8K_REG_VTU_FUNC0, reg);
> > +		ret = qca8k_vlan_access(priv, QCA8K_VLAN_LOAD, vid);
> > +	}
> > +	mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +qca8k_vlan_del(struct qca8k_priv *priv, u8 port, u16 vid)
> > +{
> > +	u32 reg;
> > +	u32 mask;
> > +	int ret;
> > +	int i;
> > +	bool del;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> > +	ret = qca8k_vlan_access(priv, QCA8K_VLAN_READ, vid);
> > +	if (ret >= 0) {
> 
> Likewise

J.

-- 
"Editing plain text configuration files has never been the Unix way,
and vi certainly isn't a standard unix tool." - mjg59, QOOC.