Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91: pm: add per soc validation of pm modes

From: Alexandre Belloni
Date: Mon Aug 03 2020 - 08:52:36 EST

Next message: Shiju Jose: "[PATCH v14 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor specific HW errors"
Previous message: Dmitry Osipenko: "Re: [PATCH -next] media: staging: tegra-vde: Mark tegra_vde_runtime_suspend as __maybe_unused"
In reply to: Claudiu.Beznea: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91: pm: add per soc validation of pm modes"
Next in thread: Claudiu Beznea: "[PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91: pm: put node after its usage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 03/08/2020 10:54:51+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c
> >> index 4f8186211619..7318d8e16797 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c
> >> @@ -13,12 +13,20 @@
> >> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> >>
> >> #include "generic.h"
> >> +#include "pm.h"
> >> +
> >> +/* AT91RM9200 valid PM modes. */
> >> +static const int at91rm9200_pm_modes[] = {
> >> + AT91_PM_STANDBY,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP0,
> >> +};
> >>
> >> static void __init at91rm9200_dt_device_init(void)
> >> {
> >> of_platform_default_populate(NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >>
> >> - at91rm9200_pm_init();
> >> + at91rm9200_pm_init(at91rm9200_pm_modes,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(at91rm9200_pm_modes));
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > You can avoid the changes in the soc files and leave everything
> > contained in pm.c as each <soc>_pm_init has a known list of mode that
> > will very likely never change. Bonus points if you make the arrays
> > __initdata.
>
> That was my initial approach. I went with the one in this patch to avoid
> adding yet another struct of_device_id array in pm.c and keep code in pm.c
> somehow platform independent. If you feel is better your way, then OK, I
> have no problems with moving it in pm.c.
>

You don't need an other struct of_device_id array as you already have
all the _pm_init functions broken out by soc family.

Going further, for at91rm9200_pm_init and at91sam9_pm_init, maybe you
can simply enforce soc_pm.data.standby_mode = AT91_PM_STANDBY and
soc_pm.data.suspend_mode = AT91_PM_ULP0 instead of checking the modes.

> >
> >> static const char *const at91rm9200_dt_board_compat[] __initconst = {
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9.c
> >> index 7e572189a5eb..683f2c35a116 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9.c
> >> @@ -13,12 +13,19 @@
> >> #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> >>
> >> #include "generic.h"
> >> +#include "pm.h"
> >> +
> >> +/* AT91SAM9 valid PM modes. */
> >> +static const int at91sam9_pm_modes[] = {
> >> + AT91_PM_STANDBY,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP0,
> >> +};
> >>
> >> static void __init at91sam9_init(void)
> >> {
> >> of_platform_default_populate(NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >>
> >> - at91sam9_pm_init();
> >> + at91sam9_pm_init(at91sam9_pm_modes, ARRAY_SIZE(at91sam9_pm_modes));
> >> }
> >>
> >> static const char *const at91_dt_board_compat[] __initconst = {
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> >> index 0a4cdcb4985b..610a12e5a71c 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h
> >> @@ -9,17 +9,17 @@
> >> #define _AT91_GENERIC_H
> >>
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> >> -extern void __init at91rm9200_pm_init(void);
> >> -extern void __init at91sam9_pm_init(void);
> >> -extern void __init sam9x60_pm_init(void);
> >> -extern void __init sama5_pm_init(void);
> >> -extern void __init sama5d2_pm_init(void);
> >> +extern void __init at91rm9200_pm_init(const int *modes, int len);
> >> +extern void __init at91sam9_pm_init(const int *modes, int len);
> >> +extern void __init sam9x60_pm_init(const int *modes, int len);
> >> +extern void __init sama5_pm_init(const int *modes, int len);
> >> +extern void __init sama5d2_pm_init(const int *modes, int len);
> >> #else
> >> -static inline void __init at91rm9200_pm_init(void) { }
> >> -static inline void __init at91sam9_pm_init(void) { }
> >> -static inline void __init sam9x60_pm_init(void) { }
> >> -static inline void __init sama5_pm_init(void) { }
> >> -static inline void __init sama5d2_pm_init(void) { }
> >> +static inline void __init at91rm9200_pm_init(const int *modes, int len) { }
> >> +static inline void __init at91sam9_pm_init(const int *modes, int len) { }
> >> +static inline void __init sam9x60_pm_init(const int *modes, int len) { }
> >> +static inline void __init sama5_pm_init(const int *modes, int len) { }
> >> +static inline void __init sama5d2_pm_init(const int *modes, int len) { }
> >> #endif
> >>
> >
> > Then this change is not necessary.
> >
> >> #endif /* _AT91_GENERIC_H */
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >> index 04fdcbd57100..caf87efc7eeb 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> >> @@ -785,6 +785,59 @@ static const struct of_device_id atmel_pmc_ids[] __initconst = {
> >> { /* sentinel */ },
> >> };
> >>
> >> +static void __init at91_pm_modes_validate(const int *modes, int len)
> >> +{
> >> + u8 i, located = 0;
> >> + int mode;
> >> +
> >> +#define STANDBY BIT(0)
> >> +#define SUSPEND BIT(1)
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> >> + if ((located & STANDBY) && (located & SUSPEND))
> >> + break;
> >> +
> >> + if (modes[i] == soc_pm.data.standby_mode &&
> >> + !(located & STANDBY)) {
> >> + located |= STANDBY;
> >> + continue;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (modes[i] == soc_pm.data.suspend_mode &&
> >> + !(located & SUSPEND)) {
> >> + located |= SUSPEND;
> >> + continue;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (!(located & STANDBY)) {
> >> + if (soc_pm.data.suspend_mode == AT91_PM_STANDBY)
> >> + mode = AT91_PM_ULP0;
> >> + else
> >> + mode = AT91_PM_STANDBY;
> >> +
> >> + pr_warn("AT91: PM: %s mode not supported! Using %s.\n",
> >> + pm_modes[soc_pm.data.standby_mode].pattern,
> >> + pm_modes[mode].pattern);
> >> + soc_pm.data.standby_mode = mode;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (!(located & SUSPEND)) {
> >> + if (soc_pm.data.standby_mode == AT91_PM_ULP0)
> >> + mode = AT91_PM_STANDBY;
> >> + else
> >> + mode = AT91_PM_ULP0;
> >> +
> >> + pr_warn("AT91: PM: %s mode not supported! Using %s.\n",
> >> + pm_modes[soc_pm.data.suspend_mode].pattern,
> >> + pm_modes[mode].pattern);
> >> + soc_pm.data.suspend_mode = mode;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> +#undef STANDBY
> >> +#undef SUSPEND
> >
> > You should use two booleans instead of a bit array, this would not make
> > the code longer and will avoid this #def/#undef thing.
>
> OK, I have no strong opinion on this. I'll switch to booleans.
>
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static void __init at91_pm_init(void (*pm_idle)(void))
> >> {
> >> struct device_node *pmc_np;
> >> @@ -821,11 +874,12 @@ static void __init at91_pm_init(void (*pm_idle)(void))
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void __init at91rm9200_pm_init(void)
> >> +void __init at91rm9200_pm_init(const int *modes, int len)
> >> {
> >> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOC_AT91RM9200))
> >> return;
> >>
> >> + at91_pm_modes_validate(modes, len);
> >> at91_dt_ramc();
> >>
> >> /*
> >> @@ -836,11 +890,12 @@ void __init at91rm9200_pm_init(void)
> >> at91_pm_init(at91rm9200_idle);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void __init sam9x60_pm_init(void)
> >> +void __init sam9x60_pm_init(const int *modes, int len)
> >> {
> >> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOC_SAM9X60))
> >> return;
> >>
> >> + at91_pm_modes_validate(modes, len);
> >> at91_pm_modes_init();
> >> at91_dt_ramc();
> >> at91_pm_init(at91sam9x60_idle);
> >> @@ -849,31 +904,33 @@ void __init sam9x60_pm_init(void)
> >> soc_pm.config_pmc_ws = at91_sam9x60_config_pmc_ws;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void __init at91sam9_pm_init(void)
> >> +void __init at91sam9_pm_init(const int *modes, int len)
> >> {
> >> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9))
> >> return;
> >>
> >> + at91_pm_modes_validate(modes, len);
> >> at91_dt_ramc();
> >> at91_pm_init(at91sam9_idle);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void __init sama5_pm_init(void)
> >> +void __init sama5_pm_init(const int *modes, int len)
> >> {
> >> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5))
> >> return;
> >>
> >> + at91_pm_modes_validate(modes, len);
> >> at91_dt_ramc();
> >> at91_pm_init(NULL);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -void __init sama5d2_pm_init(void)
> >> +void __init sama5d2_pm_init(const int *modes, int len)
> >> {
> >> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SOC_SAMA5D2))
> >> return;
> >>
> >> + sama5_pm_init(modes, len);
> >> at91_pm_modes_init();
> >> - sama5_pm_init();
> >>
> >> soc_pm.ws_ids = sama5d2_ws_ids;
> >> soc_pm.config_shdwc_ws = at91_sama5d2_config_shdwc_ws;
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sam9x60.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sam9x60.c
> >> index d8c739d25458..d7c869c7b542 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sam9x60.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sam9x60.c
> >> @@ -14,12 +14,21 @@
> >> #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> >>
> >> #include "generic.h"
> >> +#include "pm.h"
> >> +
> >> +/* SAM9X60 valid PM modes. */
> >> +static const int sam9x60_pm_modes[] = {
> >> + AT91_PM_STANDBY,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP0,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP0_FAST,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP1,
> >> +};
> >>
> >> static void __init sam9x60_init(void)
> >> {
> >> of_platform_default_populate(NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >>
> >> - sam9x60_pm_init();
> >> + sam9x60_pm_init(sam9x60_pm_modes, ARRAY_SIZE(sam9x60_pm_modes));
> >> }
> >>
> >> static const char *const sam9x60_dt_board_compat[] __initconst = {
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c
> >> index 89dab7cf01e8..7eb124612a10 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5.c
> >> @@ -14,11 +14,19 @@
> >> #include <asm/system_misc.h>
> >>
> >> #include "generic.h"
> >> +#include "pm.h"
> >> +
> >> +/* SAMA5 valid PM modes. */
> >> +static const int sama5_pm_modes[] = {
> >> + AT91_PM_STANDBY,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP0,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP0_FAST,
> >> +};
> >>
> >> static void __init sama5_dt_device_init(void)
> >> {
> >> of_platform_default_populate(NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >> - sama5_pm_init();
> >> + sama5_pm_init(sama5_pm_modes, ARRAY_SIZE(sama5_pm_modes));
> >> }
> >>
> >> static const char *const sama5_dt_board_compat[] __initconst = {
> >> @@ -44,10 +52,19 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(sama5_alt_dt, "Atmel SAMA5")
> >> .l2c_aux_mask = ~0UL,
> >> MACHINE_END
> >>
> >> +/* sama5d2 PM modes. */
> >> +static const int sama5d2_pm_modes[] = {
> >> + AT91_PM_STANDBY,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP0,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP0_FAST,
> >> + AT91_PM_ULP1,
> >> + AT91_PM_BACKUP,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> static void __init sama5d2_init(void)
> >> {
> >> of_platform_default_populate(NULL, NULL, NULL);
> >> - sama5d2_pm_init();
> >> + sama5d2_pm_init(sama5d2_pm_modes, ARRAY_SIZE(sama5d2_pm_modes));
> >> }

--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Next message: Shiju Jose: "[PATCH v14 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor specific HW errors"
Previous message: Dmitry Osipenko: "Re: [PATCH -next] media: staging: tegra-vde: Mark tegra_vde_runtime_suspend as __maybe_unused"
In reply to: Claudiu.Beznea: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: at91: pm: add per soc validation of pm modes"
Next in thread: Claudiu Beznea: "[PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91: pm: put node after its usage"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]