Re: [PATCH] kprobes: fix NULL pointer dereference at kprobe_ftrace_handler
From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Mon Aug 03 2020 - 10:50:52 EST
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 13:46:25 +0800
Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ping guys. Any comments or suggestions?
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:45 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > We found a case of kernel panic on our server. The stack trace is as
> > follows(omit some irrelevant information):
> >
> > BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000080
> > RIP: 0010:kprobe_ftrace_handler+0x5e/0xe0
> > RSP: 0018:ffffb512c6550998 EFLAGS: 00010282
> > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8e9d16eea018 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > RDX: ffffffffbe1179c0 RSI: ffffffffc0535564 RDI: ffffffffc0534ec0
> > RBP: ffffffffc0534ec1 R08: ffff8e9d1bbb0f00 R09: 0000000000000004
> > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
> > R13: ffff8e9d1f797060 R14: 000000000000bacc R15: ffff8e9ce13eca00
> > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 0000000000000080 CR3: 00000008453d0005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
> > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > Call Trace:
> > <IRQ>
> > ftrace_ops_assist_func+0x56/0xe0
> > ftrace_call+0x5/0x34
> > tcpa_statistic_send+0x5/0x130 [ttcp_engine]
> >
> > The tcpa_statistic_send is the function being kprobed. After analysis,
> > the root cause is that the fourth parameter regs of kprobe_ftrace_handler
> > is NULL. Why regs is NULL? We use the crash tool to analyze the kdump.
> >
> > crash> dis tcpa_statistic_send -r
> > <tcpa_statistic_send>: callq 0xffffffffbd8018c0 <ftrace_caller>
> >
> > The tcpa_statistic_send calls ftrace_caller instead of ftrace_regs_caller.
> > So it is reasonable that the fourth parameter regs of kprobe_ftrace_handler
> > is NULL. In theory, we should call the ftrace_regs_caller instead of the
> > ftrace_caller. After in-depth analysis, we found a reproducible path.
> >
> > Writing a simple kernel module which starts a periodic timer. The
> > timer's handler is named 'kprobe_test_timer_handler'. The module
> > name is kprobe_test.ko.
> >
> > 1) insmod kprobe_test.ko
> > 2) bpftrace -e 'kretprobe:kprobe_test_timer_handler {}'
> > 3) echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/ftrace_enabled
> > 4) rmmod kprobe_test
> > 5) stop step 2) kprobe
> > 6) insmod kprobe_test.ko
> > 7) bpftrace -e 'kretprobe:kprobe_test_timer_handler {}'
> >
> > We mark the kprobe as GONE but not disarm the kprobe in the step 4).
> > The step 5) also do not disarm the kprobe when unregister kprobe. So
> > we do not remove the ip from the filter. In this case, when the module
> > loads again in the step 6), we will replace the code to ftrace_caller
> > via the ftrace_module_enable(). When we register kprobe again, we will
> > not replace ftrace_caller to ftrace_regs_caller because the ftrace is
> > disabled in the step 3). So the step 7) will trigger kernel panic. Fix
> > this problem by disarming the kprobe when the module is going away.
> >
Nice catch!
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: ae6aa16fdc16 ("kprobes: introduce ftrace based optimization")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you!
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > kernel/kprobes.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index 146c648eb943..503add629599 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -2148,6 +2148,13 @@ static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > * the original probed function (which will be freed soon) any more.
> > */
> > arch_remove_kprobe(p);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The module is going away. We should disarm the kprobe which
> > + * is using ftrace.
> > + */
> > + if (kprobe_ftrace(p))
> > + disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p);
> > }
> >
> > /* Disable one kprobe */
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
>
>
> --
> Yours,
> Muchun
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>