RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: Intel: Add period size constraint on strago board

[Lu, Brent]

> > Hi Takashi,
> >
> > I've double checked with google. It's a must for Chromebooks due to
> > low latency use case.
> 
> I wonder if there's a misunderstanding here?
> 
> I believe Takashi's question was "is this a must to ONLY accept 240 samples
> for the period size", there was no pushback on the value itself.
> Are those boards broken with e.g. 960 samples?

I've added google people to discuss directly.

Hi Yuhsuan,
Would you explain why CRAS needs to use such short period size? Thanks.


Regards,
Brent