Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] madvise MADV_DOEXEC

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 08:44:42AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: James Bottomley
> > Sent: 03 August 2020 16:43
> > 
> > On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 10:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > [...]
> > > What is wrong with live migration between one qemu process and
> > > another qemu process on the same machine not work for this use case?
> > >
> > > Just reusing live migration would seem to be the simplest path of
> > > all, as the code is already implemented.  Further if something goes
> > > wrong with the live migration you can fallback to the existing
> > > process.  With exec there is no fallback if the new version does not
> > > properly support the handoff protocol of the old version.
> > 
> > Actually, could I ask this another way: the other patch set you sent to
> > the KVM list was to snapshot the VM to a PKRAM capsule preserved across
> > kexec using zero copy for extremely fast save/restore.  The original
> > idea was to use this as part of a CRIU based snapshot, kexec to new
> > system, restore.  However, why can't you do a local snapshot, restart
> > qemu, restore using the PKRAM capsule to achieve exactly the same as
> > MADV_DOEXEC does but using a system that's easy to reason about?  It
> > may be slightly slower, but I think we're still talking milliseconds.
> 
> 
> I've had another idea (that is probably impossible...).
> What about a 'reverse mmap' operation.
> Something that creates an fd whose contents are a chunk of the
> processes address space.

http://www.wil.cx/~willy/linux/sileby.html