Re: [PATCH] nvmem: core: add support to NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY

[Gaurav Kohli]

Please ignore this patch, some problem in my git send mail.
Apologies for the spam.


On 8/4/2020 7:44 PM, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Some users might not want to expose nvmem entry to sysfs and
> only intend to use kernel interface so add such provision.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>    Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem |  2 ++
>    drivers/nvmem/Kconfig                    |  5 +++++
>    drivers/nvmem/core.c                     | 11 ++++++-----
>    3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
> b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
> index 5923ab4620c5..12aab0a85fea 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ Description:
>    		This file allows user to read/write the raw NVMEM contents.
>    		Permissions for write to this file depends on the nvmem
>    		provider configuration.
> +		Note: This file is not present if CONFIG_NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY
> +		is enabled
>
>    		ex:
>    		hexdump /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/qfprom0/nvmem
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig b/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> index 0a7a470ee859..6ab3276d287c 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
> @@ -192,4 +192,9 @@ config SC27XX_EFUSE
>    	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>    	  will be called nvmem-sc27xx-efuse.
>
> +config NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY
> +	bool "No nvmem sysfs entry"
> +
> +	help
> +	  Say Yes if you do not want to add nvmem entry to sysfs.
>    endif
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index b9a0270883a0..c70f183fe379 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group
> nvmem_bin_rw_group = {
> 	.attrs		= nvmem_attrs,
>    };
>
> -static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_rw_dev_groups[] = {
> +static const __maybe_unused struct attribute_group
> *nvmem_rw_dev_groups[] = {
>    	&nvmem_bin_rw_group,
>    	NULL,
>    };
> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group
> nvmem_bin_ro_group = {
>    	.attrs		= nvmem_attrs,
>    };
>
> -static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_ro_dev_groups[] = {
> +static const __maybe_unused struct attribute_group
> *nvmem_ro_dev_groups[] = {
>    	&nvmem_bin_ro_group,
>    	NULL,
>    };
> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group
> nvmem_bin_rw_root_group = {
>    	.attrs		= nvmem_attrs,
>    };
>
> -static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_rw_root_dev_groups[] = {
> +static const __maybe_unused struct attribute_group
> *nvmem_rw_root_dev_groups[] = {
>    	&nvmem_bin_rw_root_group,
>    	NULL,
>    };
> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group
> nvmem_bin_ro_root_group = {
>    	.attrs		= nvmem_attrs,
>    };
>
> -static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups[] = {
> +static const __maybe_unused struct attribute_group
> *nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups[] = {
>    	&nvmem_bin_ro_root_group,
>    	NULL,
>    };
> @@ -688,6 +688,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct
> nvmem_config *config)
>    	nvmem->read_only = device_property_present(config->dev, "read-only") |
>    			   config->read_only;
>
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY)
>    	if (config->root_only)
>    		nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem->read_only ?
>    			nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups :
> @@ -696,7 +697,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct
> nvmem_config *config)
>    		nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem->read_only ?
>    			nvmem_ro_dev_groups :
>    			nvmem_rw_dev_groups;
> -
> +#endif
>    	device_initialize(&nvmem->dev);
>
>    	dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n", config->name);

--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.