Re: linux-next: manual merge of the seccomp tree with the kselftest tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:59:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the seccomp tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   4c6614dc86ad ("selftests/seccomp: Check ENOSYS under tracing")
> 
> from the kselftest tree and commit:
> 
>   11eb004ef7ea ("selftests/seccomp: Check ENOSYS under tracing")
> 
> from the seccomp tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

This is now a conflict between the kselftest tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpFppPctL5qd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature