Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] sched/topology: Propagate SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY upwards

[Ingo Molnar]

* Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> This does sound sensible; I can shuffle this around for v5.

Thanks!

> FWIW the reason I had this very patch before the instrumentation is that
> IMO it really wants to be propagated and could thus directly be tagged with
> SDF_SHARED_PARENT when the instrumentation hits. It's a minor thing, but
> having it after the instrumentation means that I'll first have to tag it
> without any hierarchical metaflag, and then tag it with SDF_SHARED_PARENT
> in the propagation fix.
> 
> If that sounds fine by you, I'll do just that.

Sounds good to me!

	Ingo