Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] Add regulator devfreq support to Panfrost

From: Rob Herring
Date: Fri Aug 07 2020 - 12:13:18 EST


On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 3:54 AM Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This serie cleans and adds regulator support to Panfrost devfreq.
> This is mostly based on comment for the freshly introduced lima
> devfreq.
>
> We need to add regulator support because on Allwinner the GPU OPP
> table defines both frequencies and voltages.
>
> First patches [01-07] should not change the actual behavior
> and introduce a proper panfrost_devfreq struct.
>
> Regards,
> Clément
>
> Changes since v4:
> - Fix missed a pfdev to &pfdev->devfreq during rebase
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Collect Steven Price reviewed-by tags
> - Rebase on next/master (next-20200709)
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Collect Alyssa Rosenzweig reviewed-by tags
> - Fix opp_set_regulator before adding opp_table (introduce in v2)
> - Call err_fini in case opp_add_table failed
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Collect Steven Price reviewed-by tags
> - Fix spinlock comment
> - Drop OPP clock-name patch
> - Drop device_property_test patch
> - Add rename error labels patch
>
> Clément Péron (14):
> drm/panfrost: avoid static declaration
> drm/panfrost: clean headers in devfreq
> drm/panfrost: don't use pfdevfreq.busy_count to know if hw is idle
> drm/panfrost: introduce panfrost_devfreq struct
> drm/panfrost: use spinlock instead of atomic
> drm/panfrost: properly handle error in probe
> drm/panfrost: rename error labels in device_init
> drm/panfrost: move devfreq_init()/fini() in device
> drm/panfrost: dynamically alloc regulators
> drm/panfrost: add regulators to devfreq
> arm64: defconfig: Enable devfreq cooling device
> arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add cooling map for GPU
> [DO NOT MERGE] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add GPU OPP table
> [DO NOT MERGE] arm64: dts: allwinner: force GPU regulator to be always

Patches 1-10 applied to drm-misc.

Rob