R: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens version

From: ansuelsmth
Date: Tue Aug 11 2020 - 09:18:35 EST

Next message: Chuck Lever: "Re: Please pull NFS server updates for v5.9"
Previous message: Sumit Garg: "Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] arm/arm64: Turning IPIs into normal interrupts"
In reply to: Amit Kucheria: "Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens version"
Next in thread: Amit Kucheria: "Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens version"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Inviato: martedì 11 agosto 2020 14:58
> A: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>; Daniel
> Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Linux PM list <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-
> msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE
> TREE BINDINGS <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; LKML <linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Oggetto: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens
> version
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 11:44 PM Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > VER_0 is used to describe device based on tsens version before v0.1.
> > These device are devices based on msm8960 for example apq8064 or
> > ipq806x.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> ------
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h | 7 +-
> > 2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > index 9fe9a2b26705..78840c1bc5d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > @@ -516,6 +516,15 @@ static irqreturn_t tsens_irq_thread(int irq, void
> *data)
> > dev_dbg(priv->dev, "[%u] %s: no violation: %d\n",
> > hw_id, __func__, temp);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) {
> > + /* Constraint: There is only 1 interrupt control register for
> all
> > + * 11 temperature sensor. So monitoring more than 1
> sensor based
> > + * on interrupts will yield inconsistent result. To overcome
> this
> > + * issue we will monitor only sensor 0 which is the master
> sensor.
> > + */
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > @@ -531,6 +540,13 @@ static int tsens_set_trips(void *_sensor, int low,
> int high)
> > int high_val, low_val, cl_high, cl_low;
> > u32 hw_id = s->hw_id;
> >
> > + if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) {
> > + /* Pre v0.1 IP had a single register for each type of interrupt
> > + * and thresholds
> > + */
> > + hw_id = 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > dev_dbg(dev, "[%u] %s: proposed thresholds: (%d:%d)\n",
> > hw_id, __func__, low, high);
> >
> > @@ -550,6 +566,12 @@ static int tsens_set_trips(void *_sensor, int low,
> int high)
> > tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, LOWER, true);
> > tsens_set_interrupt(priv, hw_id, UPPER, true);
> >
> > + /* VER_0 require to set MIN and MAX THRESH */
> > + if (tsens_version(priv) < VER_0_1) {
> > + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[MIN_THRESH_0], 0);
> > + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[MAX_THRESH_0], 120000);
>
> Since MIN_THRESH_0 and MAX_THRESH_0 are the only two threshold on
> pre
> 0.1 IP, just (mis)use the already predefined LOW_THRESH_0 and
> UP_THRESH_0 in regfield_ids in init_common() below? Then we won't need
> this special casing here. All the special casing ugliness can then
> stay in init_common() with comments.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->ul_lock, flags);
> >
> > dev_dbg(dev, "[%u] %s: (%d:%d)->(%d:%d)\n",
> > @@ -584,18 +606,21 @@ int get_temp_tsens_valid(const struct
> tsens_sensor *s, int *temp)
> > u32 valid;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > - while (!valid) {
> > - /* Valid bit is 0 for 6 AHB clock cycles.
> > - * At 19.2MHz, 1 AHB clock is ~60ns.
> > - * We should enter this loop very, very rarely.
> > - */
> > - ndelay(400);
> > + /* VER_0 doesn't have VALID bit */
> > + if (tsens_version(priv) >= VER_0_1) {
>
> Since 8960 needs a custom get_temp function, is this change really
> needed?
>

The get_temp_tsens_valid function is used to setup interrupt, think this is
the best way instead of add an if and call get_temp in the setup interrupt
function (instead of using get_temp_valid)

> > ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid);
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> > + while (!valid) {
> > + /* Valid bit is 0 for 6 AHB clock cycles.
> > + * At 19.2MHz, 1 AHB clock is ~60ns.
> > + * We should enter this loop very, very rarely.
> > + */
> > + ndelay(400);
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[valid_idx], &valid);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > /* Valid bit is set, OK to read the temperature */
> > @@ -765,8 +790,8 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> >
> > if (tsens_version(priv) > VER_0_1) {
> > for (i = VER_MAJOR; i <= VER_STEP; i++) {
> > - priv->rf[i] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->srot_map,
> > - priv->fields[i]);
> > + priv->rf[i] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->srot_map, priv->fields[i]);
>
> This doesn't change any code, simply reformats the code to 80 columns.
> Avoid adding such lines to other features, makes it harder to review
> changes.
>
> Please ignore the 80 column warning here and elsewhere below when it
> is only going over by a few characters. Run checkpatch on your patches
> which has now increased the number of columns to 100 now.
>
>
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[i]))
> > return PTR_ERR(priv->rf[i]);
> > }
> > @@ -775,12 +800,80 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv
> *priv)
> > goto err_put_device;
> > }
> >
> > - priv->rf[TSENS_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->srot_map,
> > - priv->fields[TSENS_EN]);
> > - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]);
> > - goto err_put_device;
> > + if (tsens_version(priv) >= VER_0_1) {
> > + priv->rf[TSENS_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->srot_map, priv->fields[TSENS_EN]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rf[SENSOR_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->srot_map, priv->fields[SENSOR_EN]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > + priv->rf[INT_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[INT_EN]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > + } else {
>
> Let's not create two big sections with if-else for 8960 and everything
> else. For example, what is wrong with using common code for TSENS_EN?
>
> If the concern is memory wasted trying to allocate fields not present
> on this older platform, perhaps consider adding a check in the loop to
> break early in case of 8960?
>

About TSENS_EN the old platform doesn't have SROT so I need to use TM_MAP.
Should I set the srot map to match the tm map so we can use the common function?
Aside from this problem, I will try to remove the big if-else.

> > + priv->rf[TSENS_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[TSENS_EN]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rf[TSENS_SW_RST] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[TSENS_EN]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TSENS_EN]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* enable TSENS */
> > + regmap_field_write(priv->rf[TSENS_EN], 1);
> > +
> > + priv->rf[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[LOW_INT_CLEAR_0]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rf[UP_INT_CLEAR_0] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[UP_INT_CLEAR_0]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[UP_INT_CLEAR_0])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[UP_INT_CLEAR_0]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rf[MIN_THRESH_0] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[MIN_THRESH_0]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[MIN_THRESH_0])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[MIN_THRESH_0]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rf[MAX_THRESH_0] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
> > + dev, priv->tm_map, priv->fields[MAX_THRESH_0]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[MAX_THRESH_0])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[MAX_THRESH_0]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rf[TRDY] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->tm_map,
> > + priv->fields[TRDY]);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[TRDY])) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[TRDY]);
> > + goto err_put_device;
> > + }
> > }
> > +
> > ret = regmap_field_read(priv->rf[TSENS_EN], &enabled);
> > if (ret)
> > goto err_put_device;
> > @@ -790,19 +883,6 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> > goto err_put_device;
> > }
> >
> > - priv->rf[SENSOR_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv-
> >srot_map,
> > - priv->fields[SENSOR_EN]);
> > - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN])) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[SENSOR_EN]);
> > - goto err_put_device;
> > - }
> > - priv->rf[INT_EN] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, priv->tm_map,
> > - priv->fields[INT_EN]);
> > - if (IS_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN])) {
> > - ret = PTR_ERR(priv->rf[INT_EN]);
> > - goto err_put_device;
> > - }
> > -
> > /* This loop might need changes if enum regfield_ids is reordered */
> > for (j = LAST_TEMP_0; j <= UP_THRESH_15; j += 16) {
> > for (i = 0; i < priv->feat->max_sensors; i++) {
> > @@ -856,7 +936,11 @@ int __init init_common(struct tsens_priv *priv)
> > }
> >
> > spin_lock_init(&priv->ul_lock);
> > - tsens_enable_irq(priv);
> > +
> > + /* VER_0 interrupt doesn't need to be enabled */
> > + if (tsens_version(priv) >= VER_0_1)
> > + tsens_enable_irq(priv);
> > +
> > tsens_debug_init(op);
> >
> > err_put_device:
> > @@ -952,10 +1036,18 @@ static int tsens_register_irq(struct tsens_priv
> *priv, char *irqname,
> > if (irq == -ENXIO)
> > ret = 0;
> > } else {
> > - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > - NULL, thread_fn,
> > - IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > - dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
> > + /* VER_0 have a different interrupt type */
>
> Say how it is different.
>
>
> > + if (tsens_version(priv) > VER_0)
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
> > + thread_fn, IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > + dev_name(&pdev->dev),
> > + priv);
> > + else
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
> > + thread_fn, NULL,
> > + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
> > + dev_name(&pdev->dev),
> > + priv);
> > if (ret)
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: failed to get irq\n",
> > __func__);
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> > index 59d01162c66a..f1120791737c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.h
> > @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ struct tsens_priv;
> >
> > /* IP version numbers in ascending order */
> > enum tsens_ver {
> > - VER_0_1 = 0,
> > + VER_0 = 0,
> > + VER_0_1,
> > VER_1_X,
> > VER_2_X,
> > };
> > @@ -441,6 +442,10 @@ enum regfield_ids {
> > CRIT_THRESH_14,
> > CRIT_THRESH_15,
> >
> > + /* VER_0 MIN MAX THRESH */
> > + MIN_THRESH_0,
> > + MAX_THRESH_0,
> > +
> > /* WATCHDOG */
> > WDOG_BARK_STATUS,
> > WDOG_BARK_CLEAR,
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >

Next message: Chuck Lever: "Re: Please pull NFS server updates for v5.9"
Previous message: Sumit Garg: "Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] arm/arm64: Turning IPIs into normal interrupts"
In reply to: Amit Kucheria: "Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens version"
Next in thread: Amit Kucheria: "Re: [RFC PATCH v5 1/7] drivers: thermal: tsens: Add VER_0 tsens version"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]