[PATCH 1/3] mm: don't call activate_page() on new ksm pages

[Yu Zhao]

lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable() already adds new ksm pages to
active lru. Calling activate_page() isn't really necessary in this
case.

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/swapfile.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 6c26916e95fd..cf115ea26a20 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -1913,16 +1913,16 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 		   pte_mkold(mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot)));
 	if (page == swapcache) {
 		page_add_anon_rmap(page, vma, addr, false);
+		/*
+		 * Move the page to the active list so it is not
+		 * immediately swapped out again after swapon.
+		 */
+		activate_page(page);
 	} else { /* ksm created a completely new copy */
 		page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, addr, false);
 		lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
 	}
 	swap_free(entry);
-	/*
-	 * Move the page to the active list so it is not
-	 * immediately swapped out again after swapon.
-	 */
-	activate_page(page);
 out:
 	pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
 	if (page != swapcache) {
-- 
2.28.0.236.gb10cc79966-goog