Re: [PATCH 31/33] dt: document HiSilicon SPMI controller and mfd/regulator properties

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Wed, 12 Aug 2020 10:30:36 -0600
Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:

> On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:41:57 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Add documentation for the properties needed by the HiSilicon
> > 6421v600 driver, and by the SPMI controller used to access
> > the chipset.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml       | 175 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../spmi/hisilicon,hisi-spmi-controller.yaml  |  54 ++++++
> >  2 files changed, 229 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/hisilicon,hisi-spmi-controller.yaml
> >   
> 
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml: $id: relative path/filename doesn't match actual path or filename
> 	expected: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.yaml#
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:34.15-28: Warning (reg_format): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo3@16:reg: property has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:57.15-28: Warning (reg_format): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo4@17:reg: property has invalid length (4 bytes) (#address-cells == 2, #size-cells == 1)
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (pci_device_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (pci_device_bus_num): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (simple_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (i2c_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (spi_bus_reg): Failed prerequisite 'reg_format'
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:33.27-54.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo3@16: Relying on default #address-cells value
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:33.27-54.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo3@16: Relying on default #size-cells value
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:56.27-76.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo4@17: Relying on default #address-cells value
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dts:56.27-76.15: Warning (avoid_default_addr_size): /example-0/pmic@0/regulators/ldo4@17: Relying on default #size-cells value
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: Warning (unique_unit_address): Failed prerequisite 'avoid_default_addr_size'
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/hisilicon,hisi-spmi-controller.example.dt.yaml: example-0: spmi@fff24000:reg:0: [0, 4294066176, 0, 4096] is too long
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/hisilicon,hisi-spmi-controller.example.dt.yaml: spmi@fff24000: spmi-channel:0: 'number of the SPMI channel where the PMIC is connected' was expected
> /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/hisilicon,hi6421-spmi-pmic.example.dt.yaml: pmic@0: 'spmi-channel' is a required property
> 
> 
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1343370
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date:
> 
> pip3 install git+https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema.git@master --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit.
> 

Hi Rob,

Fixed those at the newest version I submitted today via staging tree.

At least here, dt_binding_check passes at the newest version.

Regards,
Mauro