On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:12:38PM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote:
Fix the following build errors:What kernel are you building?
In file included from ./include/linux/time.h:6:0,
from ./include/linux/compat.h:10,
from arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
./include/linux/seqlock.h: In function ‘write_seqcount_begin_nested’:
./include/linux/seqlock.h:286:2: error: implicit declaration of function
‘raw_smp_processor_id’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled();
^
./arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h: At top level:
./arch/mips/include/asm/smp.h:28:19: error: static declaration of
‘raw_smp_processor_id’ follows non-static declaration
static inline int raw_smp_processor_id(void)
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
scripts/Makefile.build:117: recipe for target 'arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s' failed
make[1]: *** [arch/mips/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
arch/mips/Makefile:396: recipe for target 'archprepare' failed
make: *** [archprepare] Error 2
Commit 0cd39f4600ed ("locking/seqlock, headers: Untangle the spaghetti monster")
should have solved that I think.
Signed-off-by: Xingxing Su <suxingxing@xxxxxxxxxxx>Wrong place, it's lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled() that requires
---
v2: update the commit message
include/linux/seqlock.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h
index 54bc204..4763c13 100644
--- a/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
#include <linux/kcsan-checks.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
asm/percpu.h, and thus lockdep.h should include linux/smp. before
asm/percpu.h