Re: [RFC-PATCH 1/2] mm: Add __GFP_NO_LOCKS flag

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Fri Aug 14 2020 - 12:11:09 EST


On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 07:14:25AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:30:37AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 01:59:04AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

[ . . . ]

> > > > 3. Reusing existing GFP_ flags/values/whatever to communicate
> > > > the raw-context information that was to be communicated by
> > > > the new GFP_ flag.
> > > >
> > > > 4. Making lockdep forgive acquiring spinlocks while holding
> > > > raw spinlocks, but only in CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y kernels.
> >
> > Uhh, !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, the rest is 'fine'.
>
> I would be OK with either. In CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=n kernels, the
> kfree_rcu() code could use preemptible() to determine whether it was safe
> to invoke the allocator. The code in kfree_rcu() might look like this:
>
> mem = NULL;
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE) || preemptible())
> mem = __get_free_page(...);
>
> Is your point is that the usual mistakes would then be caught by the
> usual testing on CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=n kernels?

Just to make sure we are talking about the same thing, please see below
for an untested patch that illustrates how I was interpreting your words.
Was this what you had in mind?

Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 62a382d..42d0ff1 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ do { \
# define lockdep_assert_preemption_disabled() do { } while (0)
#endif

-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING_EFFECTIVE

# define lockdep_assert_RT_in_threaded_ctx() do { \
WARN_ONCE(debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion && \
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep_types.h b/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
index bb35b44..70867d58 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep_types.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ enum lockdep_wait_type {
LD_WAIT_FREE, /* wait free, rcu etc.. */
LD_WAIT_SPIN, /* spin loops, raw_spinlock_t etc.. */

-#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING
+#ifdef PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING_EFFECTIVE
LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_LOCK, spinlock_t etc.. */
#else
LD_WAIT_CONFIG = LD_WAIT_SPIN,
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index e068c3c..e02de40 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1215,6 +1215,9 @@ config PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING

If unsure, select N.

+config PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING_EFFECTIVE
+ def_bool PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING && !PREEMPTION
+
config LOCK_STAT
bool "Lock usage statistics"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT