Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Whitespace clean-ups in schema files

From: Luca Ceresoli
Date: Fri Aug 14 2020 - 12:30:32 EST


Hi,

On 14/08/20 16:51, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 4:31 AM Luca Ceresoli <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 12/08/20 22:36, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Clean-up incorrect indentation, extra spaces, long lines, and missing
>>> EOF newline in schema files. Most of the clean-ups are for list
>>> indentation which should always be 2 spaces more than the preceding
>>> keyword.
>>>
>>> Found with yamllint (which I plan to integrate into the checks).
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/idt,versaclock5.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/idt,versaclock5.yaml
>>> index 3d4e1685cc55..28c6461b9a9a 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/idt,versaclock5.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/idt,versaclock5.yaml
>>> @@ -95,10 +95,10 @@ allOf:
>>> # Devices without builtin crystal
>>> properties:
>>> clock-names:
>>> - minItems: 1
>>> - maxItems: 2
>>> - items:
>>> - enum: [ xin, clkin ]
>>> + minItems: 1
>>> + maxItems: 2
>>> + items:
>>> + enum: [ xin, clkin ]
>>> clocks:
>>> minItems: 1
>>> maxItems: 2
>>
>> Thanks for noticing, LGTM.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.yaml
>>> index d7dac16a3960..36dc7b56a453 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.yaml
>>> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ properties:
>>> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>>
>>> touchscreen-min-pressure:
>>> - description: minimum pressure on the touchscreen to be achieved in order for the
>>> - touchscreen driver to report a touch event.
>>> + description: minimum pressure on the touchscreen to be achieved in order
>>> + for the touchscreen driver to report a touch event.
>>
>> Out of personal taste, I find the original layout more pleasant and
>> readable. This third option is also good, especially for long descriptions:
>>
>> description:
>> minimum pressure on the touchscreen to be achieved in order for the
>> touchscreen driver to report a touch event.
>>
>> At first glance yamllint seems to support exactly these two by default:
>>
>>> With indentation: {spaces: 4, check-multi-line-strings: true}
>
> Turning on check-multi-line-strings results in 10K+ warnings, so no.
>
> The other issue is the style ruamel.yaml wants to write out is as the
> patch does above. This matters when doing some scripted
> transformations where we read in the files and write them back out. I
> can somewhat work around that by first doing a pass with no changes
> and then another pass with the actual changes, but that's completely
> scriptable. Hopefully, ruamel learns to preserve the style better.

Kind of sad, but I understand the reason as far as my understanding of
the yaml world allows. Thanks for the explanation.

[For idt,versaclock5.yaml, plus an overview of whole patch]
Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Luca