Re: [PATCH] mm : update ra->ra_pages if it's NOT equal to bdi->ra_pages

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Fri Aug 14 2020 - 13:46:52 EST


On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 07:33:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 10:20:11 +0800 Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > No, What I want to fix is the file within one process's context keeps
> > using the initialized value when it is opened and not sync with new
> > value when bdi->ra_pages changes.
>
> So you're saying that
>
> echo xxx > /sys/block/dm/queue/read_ahead_kb
>
> does not affect presently-open files, and you believe that it should do
> so?
>
> I guess that could be a reasonable thing to want - it's reasonable for
> a user to expect that writing to a global tunable will take immediate
> global effect. I guess.

But it's also reasonable for someone to have written an application
assuming that the current behaviour won't change.

As I understand it, if we change net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling, that will
take effect only for new connections, and not for existing ones.

I think the _real_ problem is that readahead never scales down, except
for EIO.

I don't have time to take on another project right now, but I think this
patch is too simplistic and has too many downsides. Someone needs to
really think the readahead situation through properly.