Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: rockchip: Work around missing device_type property in DT
From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Sat Aug 15 2020 - 19:22:43 EST
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:51:11PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Recent changes to the DT PCI bus parsing made it mandatory for
> device tree nodes describing a PCI controller to have the
> 'device_type = "pci"' property for the node to be matched.
>
> Although this follows the letter of the specification, it
> breaks existing device-trees that have been working fine
> for years. Rockchip rk3399-based systems are a prime example
> of such collateral damage, and have stopped discovering their
> PCI bus.
>
> In order to paper over the blunder, let's add a workaround
> to the pcie-rockchip driver, adding the missing property when
> none is found at boot time. A warning will hopefully nudge the
> user into updating their DT to a fixed version if they can, but
> the insentive is obviously pretty small.
s/insentive/incentive/ (Lorenzo or I can fix this up)
> Fixes: 2f96593ecc37 ("of_address: Add bus type match for pci ranges parser")
> Suggested-by: Roh Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
s/Roh/Rob/ (similarly)
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
This looks like a candidate for v5.9, since 2f96593ecc37 was merged
during the v5.9 merge window, right?
I wonder how many other DTs are similarly broken? Maybe Rob's DT
checker has already looked?
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
> index 0bb2fb3e8a0b..d7dd04430a99 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-host.c
> @@ -949,6 +949,35 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!dev->of_node)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /*
> + * Most rk3399 DTs are missing the 'device_type = "pci"' property,
> + * potentially leading to PCIe probing failure. Be kind to the
> + * users and fix it up for them. Upgrading is recommended.
> + */
> + if (!of_find_property(dev->of_node, "device_type", NULL)) {
> + const char dtype[] = "pci";
> + struct property *prop;
> +
> + dev_warn(dev, "Working around missing device_type property\n");
> +
> + prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!prop)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + prop->name = kstrdup("device_type", GFP_KERNEL);
> + prop->value = kstrdup(dtype, GFP_KERNEL);
> + prop->length = ARRAY_SIZE(dtype);
> + if (!prop->name || !prop->value) {
> + kfree(prop->name);
> + kfree(prop->value);
> + kfree(prop);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_add_property(dev->of_node, prop))
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to add property, probing may fail");
> + }
> +
> bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(*rockchip));
> if (!bridge)
> return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel