[PATCH 5.4 145/270] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Aug 17 2020 - 12:58:54 EST


From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 9ff8a616dfab96a4fa0ddd36190907dc68886d9b ]

Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree().
Both AppArmor and SELinux do additional work in their audit_rule_free()
hooks. Fix memory leaks by allowing the LSMs to perform necessary work.

Fixes: b16942455193 ("ima: use the lsm policy update notifier")
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 5 +++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index be469fce19e12..8173982e00ab5 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ static inline void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig)
#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES

#define security_filter_rule_init security_audit_rule_init
+#define security_filter_rule_free security_audit_rule_free
#define security_filter_rule_match security_audit_rule_match

#else
@@ -372,6 +373,10 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
return -EINVAL;
}

+static inline void security_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
+{
+}
+
static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
void *lsmrule)
{
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 558a7607bf93a..e725d41872713 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
int i;

for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
- kfree(entry->lsm[i].rule);
+ security_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule);
kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
}
kfree(entry);
--
2.25.1