Quoting Tanmay Shah (2020-08-17 15:53:00)Ok fine. But, that will break DP driver functionality.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
index 31b9217bb5bf..bf2f2bb1aa79 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
@@ -2440,6 +2447,71 @@ dsi_phy: dsi-phy@ae94400 {
status = "disabled";
};
+
+ msm_dp: displayport-controller@ae90000 {
This should come before dsi-phy and dsi node. It should be sorted by the
address (0xae90000).
+ status = "disabled";[...]
+ compatible = "qcom,sc7180-dp";
+
+ reg = <0 0x0ae90000 0 0x1400>;
+
+ interrupt-parent = <&mdss>;
+ interrupts = <12>;
+
};
dispcc: clock-controller@af00000 {
@@ -2449,8 +2521,8 @@ dispcc: clock-controller@af00000 {
<&gcc GCC_DISP_GPLL0_CLK_SRC>,
<&dsi_phy 0>,
<&dsi_phy 1>,
- <0>,
- <0>;
+ <&msm_dp 0>,
+ <&msm_dp 1>;
Don't think we should apply this still because the binding will change
when the phy is split out to qmp node. Maybe just leave this part off
for now?