Re: [PATCH] libceph: Convert to use the preferred fallthrough macro

From: Jeff Layton
Date: Tue Aug 18 2020 - 15:56:46 EST


On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 08:26 -0400, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Convert the uses of fallthrough comments to fallthrough macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/ceph/ceph_hash.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> net/ceph/crush/mapper.c | 2 +-
> net/ceph/messenger.c | 4 ++--
> net/ceph/mon_client.c | 2 +-
> net/ceph/osd_client.c | 4 ++--
> 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/ceph_hash.c b/net/ceph/ceph_hash.c
> index 81e1e006c540..16a47c0eef37 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/ceph_hash.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/ceph_hash.c
> @@ -50,35 +50,35 @@ unsigned int ceph_str_hash_rjenkins(const char *str, unsigned int length)
> switch (len) {
> case 11:
> c = c + ((__u32)k[10] << 24);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 10:
> c = c + ((__u32)k[9] << 16);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 9:
> c = c + ((__u32)k[8] << 8);
> /* the first byte of c is reserved for the length */
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 8:
> b = b + ((__u32)k[7] << 24);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 7:
> b = b + ((__u32)k[6] << 16);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 6:
> b = b + ((__u32)k[5] << 8);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 5:
> b = b + k[4];
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 4:
> a = a + ((__u32)k[3] << 24);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 3:
> a = a + ((__u32)k[2] << 16);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 2:
> a = a + ((__u32)k[1] << 8);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case 1:
> a = a + k[0];
> /* case 0: nothing left to add */
> diff --git a/net/ceph/crush/mapper.c b/net/ceph/crush/mapper.c
> index 07e5614eb3f1..7057f8db4f99 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/crush/mapper.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/crush/mapper.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ int crush_do_rule(const struct crush_map *map,
> case CRUSH_RULE_CHOOSELEAF_FIRSTN:
> case CRUSH_RULE_CHOOSE_FIRSTN:
> firstn = 1;
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case CRUSH_RULE_CHOOSELEAF_INDEP:
> case CRUSH_RULE_CHOOSE_INDEP:
> if (wsize == 0)
> diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> index 27d6ab11f9ee..bdfd66ba3843 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static void ceph_sock_state_change(struct sock *sk)
> switch (sk->sk_state) {
> case TCP_CLOSE:
> dout("%s TCP_CLOSE\n", __func__);
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case TCP_CLOSE_WAIT:
> dout("%s TCP_CLOSE_WAIT\n", __func__);
> con_sock_state_closing(con);
> @@ -2751,7 +2751,7 @@ static int try_read(struct ceph_connection *con)
> switch (ret) {
> case -EBADMSG:
> con->error_msg = "bad crc/signature";
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case -EBADE:
> ret = -EIO;
> break;
> diff --git a/net/ceph/mon_client.c b/net/ceph/mon_client.c
> index 3d8c8015e976..d633a0aeaa55 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/mon_client.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/mon_client.c
> @@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ static struct ceph_msg *mon_alloc_msg(struct ceph_connection *con,
> * request had a non-zero tid. Work around this weirdness
> * by allocating a new message.
> */
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case CEPH_MSG_MON_MAP:
> case CEPH_MSG_MDS_MAP:
> case CEPH_MSG_OSD_MAP:
> diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> index e4fbcad6e7d8..7901ab6c79fd 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> @@ -3854,7 +3854,7 @@ static void scan_requests(struct ceph_osd *osd,
> if (!force_resend && !force_resend_writes)
> break;
>
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case CALC_TARGET_NEED_RESEND:
> cancel_linger_map_check(lreq);
> /*
> @@ -3891,7 +3891,7 @@ static void scan_requests(struct ceph_osd *osd,
> !force_resend_writes))
> break;
>
> - /* fall through */
> + fallthrough;
> case CALC_TARGET_NEED_RESEND:
> cancel_map_check(req);
> unlink_request(osd, req);


Looks sane. Merged into ceph-client/testing branch.

Thanks!
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>