Re: [PATCH v36 21/24] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call

[Jethro Beekman]

On 2020-08-19 15:33, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 12:44 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:15:32AM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>> That seems like overkill to me. I'm just asking for one additional mov
>>> instruction. :)
>>
>> I started to consider eBPF since the complexity and constraints of the
>> callback look like an overkill and without doubt will be a burden to
>> maintain.
> 
> That feels to me like more complexity just to move the existing
> complexity from one place to another.
> 

Agreed that BPF doesn't make things better.

--
Jethro Beekman | Fortanix

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature