Re: [PATCH v2] mm: include CMA pages in lowmem_reserve at boot

[Florian Fainelli]

On 8/18/20 8:18 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:49:26 -0700 Doug Berger <opendmb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> The lowmem_reserve arrays provide a means of applying pressure
>> against allocations from lower zones that were targeted at
>> higher zones. Its values are a function of the number of pages
>> managed by higher zones and are assigned by a call to the
>> setup_per_zone_lowmem_reserve() function.
>>
>> The function is initially called at boot time by the function
>> init_per_zone_wmark_min() and may be called later by accesses
>> of the /proc/sys/vm/lowmem_reserve_ratio sysctl file.
>>
>> The function init_per_zone_wmark_min() was moved up from a
>> module_init to a core_initcall to resolve a sequencing issue
>> with khugepaged. Unfortunately this created a sequencing issue
>> with CMA page accounting.
>>
>> The CMA pages are added to the managed page count of a zone
>> when cma_init_reserved_areas() is called at boot also as a
>> core_initcall. This makes it uncertain whether the CMA pages
>> will be added to the managed page counts of their zones before
>> or after the call to init_per_zone_wmark_min() as it becomes
>> dependent on link order. With the current link order the pages
>> are added to the managed count after the lowmem_reserve arrays
>> are initialized at boot.
>>
>> This means the lowmem_reserve values at boot may be lower than
>> the values used later if /proc/sys/vm/lowmem_reserve_ratio is
>> accessed even if the ratio values are unchanged.
>>
>> In many cases the difference is not significant, but for example
>> an ARM platform with 1GB of memory and the following memory layout
>> [    0.000000] cma: Reserved 256 MiB at 0x0000000030000000
>> [    0.000000] Zone ranges:
>> [    0.000000]   DMA      [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000002fffffff]
>> [    0.000000]   Normal   empty
>> [    0.000000]   HighMem  [mem 0x0000000030000000-0x000000003fffffff]
>>
>> would result in 0 lowmem_reserve for the DMA zone. This would allow
>> userspace to deplete the DMA zone easily.
> 
> Sounds fairly serious for thos machines.  Was a cc:stable considered?

Since there is a Fixes: tag, it may have been assumed that the patch
would be picked up and as soon as it reaches Linus' tree it would be
picked up by the stable selection.
-- 
Florian