Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/7] bpf: Generalize bpf_sk_storage

[KP Singh]

On 19.08.20 19:12, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:41:50PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
>> On 8/18/20 3:05 AM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 06:46:51PM +0200, KP Singh wrote:
>>>> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Refactor the functionality in bpf_sk_storage.c so that concept of

[...]

>>>> +			struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
>>>> +			struct bpf_local_storage_elem *first_selem);
>>>> +
>>>> +struct bpf_local_storage_data *
>>>> +bpf_local_storage_update(void *owner, struct bpf_map *map, void *value,
>>> Nit.  It may be more consistent to take "struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap"
>>> instead of "struct bpf_map *map" here.
>>>
>>> bpf_local_storage_map_check_btf() will be the only one taking
>>> "struct bpf_map *map".
>>
>> That's because it is used in map operations as map_check_btf which expects
>> a bpf_map *map pointer. We can wrap it in another function but is that
>> worth doing?
> Agree.  bpf_local_storage_map_check_btf() should stay as is.
> 
> I meant to only change the "bpf_local_storage_update()" to take
> "struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap".
> 

Apologies, I misread that. Updated.

- KP

 up here
>> 	 * or when the storage is freed e.g.
>> 	 * by bpf_sk_storage_free() during __sk_destruct().
>>
> +1
>