On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:21 AM Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/20/20 10:10 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 05:21:33PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:25 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 11:19 AM Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/19/20 1:07 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
It looks like the FSGSBASE support is crashing my second generation EPYC
system. I was able to bisect it to:
b745cfba44c1 ("x86/cpu: Enable FSGSBASE on 64bit by default and add a chicken bit")
The panic only happens when using KVM. Doing kernel builds or stress
on bare-metal appears fine. But if I fire up, in this case, a 64-vCPU
guest and do a kernel build within the guest, I get the following:
I should clarify that this panic is on the bare-metal system, not in the
guest. And that specifying nofsgsbase on the bare-metal command line fixes
the issue.
I certainly see some oddities:
We have this code:
static void svm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
int i;
avic_vcpu_put(vcpu);
++vcpu->stat.host_state_reload;
kvm_load_ldt(svm->host.ldt);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
loadsegment(fs, svm->host.fs);
wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, current->thread.gsbase);
Pretty sure current->thread.gsbase can be stale, i.e. this needs:
current_save_fsgs();
I did try adding current_save_fsgs() in svm_vcpu_load(), saving the
current->thread.gsbase value to a new variable in the svm struct. I then
used that variable in the wrmsrl below, but it still crashed.
Can you try bisecting all the way back to:
commit dd649bd0b3aa012740059b1ba31ecad28a408f7f
Author: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu May 28 16:13:48 2020 -0400
x86/cpu: Add 'unsafe_fsgsbase' to enable CR4.FSGSBASE
and adding the unsafe_fsgsbase command line option while you bisect.
Also, you're crashing when you run a guest, right? Can you try
running the x86 sefltests on a bad kernel without running any guests?
--Andy