Re: [RFC 1/3] Initialize devlink health dump framework for the dlge driver
From: Coiby Xu
Date: Thu Aug 20 2020 - 23:08:40 EST
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:56:40AM +0900, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
On 2020-08-15 00:05 +0800, Coiby Xu wrote:
Initialize devlink health dump framework for the dlge driver so the
coredump could be done via devlink.
Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/qlge/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h | 9 +++++++
drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.h | 2 ++
drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.c
create mode 100644 drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.h
diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/Makefile b/drivers/staging/qlge/Makefile
index 1dc2568e820c..0a1e4c8dd546 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/qlge/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/Makefile
@@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_QLGE) += qlge.o
-qlge-objs := qlge_main.o qlge_dbg.o qlge_mpi.o qlge_ethtool.o
+qlge-objs := qlge_main.o qlge_dbg.o qlge_mpi.o qlge_ethtool.o qlge_health.o
diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h
index fc8c5ca8935d..055ded6dab60 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge.h
@@ -2061,6 +2061,14 @@ struct nic_operations {
int (*port_initialize) (struct ql_adapter *);
};
This patch doesn't apply over the latest staging tree. I think your tree
is missing commit d923bb6bf508 ("staging: qlge: qlge.h: Function
definition arguments should have names.")
Thank you for applying the patch to test it! I had incorrect
understanding about the word "RFC" and didn't do a rebase onto
the latest staging tree.
+
+
+struct qlge_devlink {
+ struct ql_adapter *qdev;
+ struct net_device *ndev;
I don't have experience implementing devlink callbacks but looking at
some other devlink users (mlx4, ionic, ice), all of them use devlink
priv space for their main private structure. That would be struct
ql_adapter in this case. Is there a good reason to stray from that
pattern?
+ struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter;
+};
+
/*
* The main Adapter structure definition.
* This structure has all fields relevant to the hardware.
@@ -2078,6 +2086,7 @@ struct ql_adapter {
struct pci_dev *pdev;
struct net_device *ndev; /* Parent NET device */
+ struct qlge_devlink *devlink;
/* Hardware information */
u32 chip_rev_id;
u32 fw_rev_id;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..292f6b1827e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.c
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#include "qlge.h"
+#include "qlge_health.h"
+
+static int
+qlge_reporter_coredump(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter,
+ struct devlink_fmsg *fmsg, void *priv_ctx,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct devlink_health_reporter_ops qlge_reporter_ops = {
+ .name = "dummy",
+ .dump = qlge_reporter_coredump,
+};
I think
select NET_DEVLINK
should be added to drivers/staging/qlge/Kconfig
Thank you for reminding me!
+
+int qlge_health_create_reporters(struct qlge_devlink *priv)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter;
+ struct devlink *devlink;
+
+ devlink = priv_to_devlink(priv);
+ reporter =
+ devlink_health_reporter_create(devlink, &qlge_reporter_ops,
+ 0,
+ priv);
+ if (IS_ERR(reporter)) {
+ netdev_warn(priv->ndev,
+ "Failed to create reporter, err = %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(reporter));
+ return PTR_ERR(reporter);
+ }
+ priv->reporter = reporter;
+
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
Stray newlines
Will fix it in v1.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.h b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..07d3bafab845
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_health.h
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+#include <net/devlink.h>
+int qlge_health_create_reporters(struct qlge_devlink *priv);
I would suggest to put this in qlge.h instead of creating a new file.
Although there are only two lines for now, is it possible qlge will add
more devlink code? If that's the case, a file to single out these code
is necessary as is the same to some other drivers,
$ find drivers -name *health*.h
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/health.h
$ find drivers -name *devlink*.h
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.h
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/devlink.h
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.h
drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_devlink.h
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.h
diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
index 1650de13842f..b2be7f4b7dd6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
#include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
#include "qlge.h"
+#include "qlge_health.h"
char qlge_driver_name[] = DRV_NAME;
const char qlge_driver_version[] = DRV_VERSION;
@@ -4550,6 +4551,8 @@ static void ql_timer(struct timer_list *t)
mod_timer(&qdev->timer, jiffies + (5 * HZ));
}
+static const struct devlink_ops qlge_devlink_ops;
+
static int qlge_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
const struct pci_device_id *pci_entry)
{
@@ -4557,6 +4560,13 @@ static int qlge_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
struct ql_adapter *qdev = NULL;
static int cards_found;
int err = 0;
+ struct devlink *devlink;
+ struct qlge_devlink *qlge_dl;
+
+ devlink = devlink_alloc(&qlge_devlink_ops, sizeof(struct qlge_devlink));
+ if (!devlink)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ qlge_dl = devlink_priv(devlink);
ndev = alloc_etherdev_mq(sizeof(struct ql_adapter),
min(MAX_CPUS,
@@ -4615,6 +4625,15 @@ static int qlge_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
free_netdev(ndev);
return err;
}
+
+ err = devlink_register(devlink, &pdev->dev);
+ if (err)
+ devlink_free(devlink);
Are you sure it's safe to continue devlink init after an error here?
Again, that does not resemble usage of devlink in other drivers (ex.
bnxt).
Thank you for pointing out my neglect!
+
+ qlge_health_create_reporters(qlge_dl);
+ qlge_dl->qdev = qdev;
+ qlge_dl->ndev = ndev;
+ qdev->devlink = qlge_dl;
/* Start up the timer to trigger EEH if
* the bus goes dead
*/
@@ -4647,6 +4666,8 @@ static void qlge_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
unregister_netdev(ndev);
ql_release_all(pdev);
pci_disable_device(pdev);
+ devlink_unregister(priv_to_devlink(qdev->devlink));
+ devlink_health_reporter_destroy(qdev->devlink->reporter);
Isn't the order of those two calls mixed up?
I haven't studied the code to figure out why but other drivers also
use the same order.
free_netdev(ndev);
}
--
2.27.0
--
Best regards,
Coiby