Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] regulator: mp886x: implement set_ramp_delay

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:17:29AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:

> I found the reason, the three patches in v2 were applied to for-next tree.
> Should I renew patches based on for-next? Since the "mps,switch-frequency"
> binding isn't released and used, I think I can send new patches to convert
> mps,switch-frequency to mps,switch-frequency-hz.

Yes, please - for-next is best for anything that isn't a bug fix.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature