Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] net: socket: implement SO_DESCRIPTION
From: Pascal Bouchareine
Date: Sat Aug 22 2020 - 15:59:26 EST
Thank you,
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:36 PM David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We ignore optlen and constrain the string to a static max size
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pascal Bouchareine <kalou@xxxxxxx>
>
> This change is really a non-starter unless the information gets
> published somewhere where people actually look at dumped sockets, and
> that's inet_diag and friends.
Would it make sense to also make UDIAG_SHOW_NAME use sk_description?
(And keep the existing change - setsockopt + show_fd_info via
/proc/.../fdinfo/..)
I would feel like adding a pid information (and what else am I missing
here) to inet_diag might also be a good improvement then?
I understand that users have to scan /proc to find the FDs, matching
the inode number for the socket to find the owning process today.
If that's of interest I can explore that too