Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] printk: implement pr_cont_t

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (20/08/20 12:16), Petr Mladek wrote:
> Now that I think about it. This is the biggest problem with any temporary buffer
> for pr_cont() lines. I am more and more convinced that we should just
> _keep the current behavior_. It is not ideal. But sometimes mixed
> messages are always better than lost ones.

Agreed. John, let's move this into a backlog for the time being? We can
continue discussions, but first let's fix the empty lines for cont line
print outs in the current dmesg output.

	-ss