[PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add ->offline and ->online callbacks

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, August 22, 2020 2:47:16 AM CEST Doug Smythies wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> Just annoying typo type feedback.

Thanks!

Please find a corrected patch below.

Cheers!

---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add ->offline and ->online callbacks

Add ->offline and ->online driver callbacks to prepare for taking a
CPU offline and to restore its working configuration when it goes
back online, respectively, to avoid invoking the ->init callback on
every CPU online which is quite a bit of unnecessary overhead.

Define ->offline and ->online so that they can be used in the
passive mode as well as in the active mode and because ->offline
will do the majority of ->stop_cpu work, the passive mode does
not need that callback any more, so drop it.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2297,28 +2297,51 @@ static int intel_pstate_verify_policy(st
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void intel_cpufreq_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+static int intel_pstate_cpu_offline(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
+	pr_debug("CPU %d going offline\n", policy->cpu);
+
+	intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits(policy);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the CPU is an SMT thread and it goes offline with the performance
+	 * settings different from the minimum, it will prevent its sibling
+	 * from getting to lower performance levels, so force the minimum
+	 * performance on CPU offline to prevent that from happening.
+	 */
 	if (hwp_active)
 		intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(policy->cpu);
 	else
 		intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int intel_pstate_cpu_online(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	pr_debug("CPU %d going online\n", policy->cpu);
+
+	intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits(policy);
+
+	if (hwp_active)
+		wrmsrl_on_cpu(policy->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST,
+			      all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]->hwp_req_cached);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void intel_pstate_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
-	pr_debug("CPU %d exiting\n", policy->cpu);
+	pr_debug("CPU %d stopping\n", policy->cpu);
 
 	intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
 	if (hwp_active)
 		intel_pstate_hwp_save_state(policy);
-
-	intel_cpufreq_stop_cpu(policy);
 }
 
 static int intel_pstate_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
-	intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits(policy);
+	pr_debug("CPU %d exiting\n", policy->cpu);
 
 	policy->fast_switch_possible = false;
 
@@ -2398,6 +2421,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver intel_pstat
 	.init		= intel_pstate_cpu_init,
 	.exit		= intel_pstate_cpu_exit,
 	.stop_cpu	= intel_pstate_stop_cpu,
+	.offline	= intel_pstate_cpu_offline,
+	.online		= intel_pstate_cpu_online,
 	.update_limits	= intel_pstate_update_limits,
 	.name		= "intel_pstate",
 };
@@ -2652,7 +2677,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver intel_cpufr
 	.fast_switch	= intel_cpufreq_fast_switch,
 	.init		= intel_cpufreq_cpu_init,
 	.exit		= intel_cpufreq_cpu_exit,
-	.stop_cpu	= intel_cpufreq_stop_cpu,
+	.offline	= intel_pstate_cpu_offline,
+	.online		= intel_pstate_cpu_online,
 	.update_limits	= intel_pstate_update_limits,
 	.name		= "intel_cpufreq",
 };