Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] genirq: Shutdown irq chips in suspend/resume during hibernation

From: Anchal Agarwal
Date: Mon Aug 24 2020 - 13:28:19 EST


On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 02:36:37AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 21 2020 at 22:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Add a new quirk flag IRQCHIP_SHUTDOWN_ON_SUSPEND and add support for
> > it the core interrupt suspend/resume paths.
> >
> > Changelog:
> > v1->v2: Corrected the author's name to tglx@
>
> Can you please move that Changelog part below the --- seperator next
> time because that's really not part of the final commit messaage and the
> maintainer has then to strip it off manually
>
Ack.
> > Signed-off-by: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> These SOB lines are just wrongly ordered as they suggest:
>
> Anchal has authored the patch and Thomas transported it
>
> which is clearly not the case. So the right order is:
>
I must admit I wasn't aware of that. Will fix.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> And that needs another tweak at the top of the change log. The first
> line in the mail body wants to be:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yes I accidentally missed that in this patch.
Others have that line on all the patches and even v2 for this patch
has. Will fix.
>
> followed by an empty new line before the actual changelog text
> starts. That way the attribution of the patch when applying it will be
> correct.
>
> Documentation/process/ is there for a reason and following the few
> simple rules to get that straight is not rocket science.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>
Anchal