Re: [RESEND 1/3] venus: core: handle race condititon for core ops

From: mansur
Date: Mon Aug 24 2020 - 21:43:52 EST


On 2020-08-21 16:29, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
Hi Mansur,

On 8/10/20 12:50 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
Hi Mansur,

Thanks for the patches!

On 8/7/20 9:24 AM, Mansur Alisha Shaik wrote:
For core ops we are having only write protect but there
is no read protect, because of this in multthreading
and concurrency, one CPU core is reading without wait
which is causing the NULL pointer dereferece crash.

one such scenario is as show below, where in one
core core->ops becoming NULL and in another core
calling core->ops->session_init().

CPU: core-7:
Call trace:
hfi_session_init+0x180/0x1dc [venus_core]
vdec_queue_setup+0x9c/0x364 [venus_dec]
vb2_core_reqbufs+0x1e4/0x368 [videobuf2_common]
vb2_reqbufs+0x4c/0x64 [videobuf2_v4l2]
v4l2_m2m_reqbufs+0x50/0x84 [v4l2_mem2mem]
v4l2_m2m_ioctl_reqbufs+0x2c/0x38 [v4l2_mem2mem]
v4l_reqbufs+0x4c/0x5c
__video_do_ioctl+0x2b0/0x39c

CPU: core-0:
Call trace:
venus_shutdown+0x98/0xfc [venus_core]
venus_sys_error_handler+0x64/0x148 [venus_core]
process_one_work+0x210/0x3d0
worker_thread+0x248/0x3f4
kthread+0x11c/0x12c

Signed-off-by: Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c | 2 +-
drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

See below comment, otherwise:

Acked-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@xxxxxxxxxx>


diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
index 203c653..fe99c83 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c
@@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ static void venus_sys_error_handler(struct work_struct *work)
pm_runtime_get_sync(core->dev);

hfi_core_deinit(core, true);
- hfi_destroy(core);
mutex_lock(&core->lock);
+ hfi_destroy(core);

As my recovery fixes [1] touches this part also, could you please apply
them on top of yours and re-test?

I'll drop above chunk from the patch because it is already taken into
account in my recovery fixes series and queue up the patch for v5.10.

yes, you can drop. I have validated these patches on top of your recovery patch
series. I will push V2 with dependency on "venus - recovery from frimware crash"
series (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=455962)


Otherwise this patch looks good to me.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arm-msm/msg70092.html

venus_shutdown(core);

pm_runtime_put_sync(core->dev);
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi.c
index a211eb9..2eeb31f 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi.c
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hfi_session_create);
int hfi_session_init(struct venus_inst *inst, u32 pixfmt)
{
struct venus_core *core = inst->core;
- const struct hfi_ops *ops = core->ops;
+ const struct hfi_ops *ops;
int ret;

if (inst->state != INST_UNINIT)
@@ -204,10 +204,13 @@ int hfi_session_init(struct venus_inst *inst, u32 pixfmt)
inst->hfi_codec = to_codec_type(pixfmt);
reinit_completion(&inst->done);

+ mutex_lock(&core->lock);
+ ops = core->ops;
ret = ops->session_init(inst, inst->session_type, inst->hfi_codec);
if (ret)
return ret;

+ mutex_unlock(&core->lock);
ret = wait_session_msg(inst);
if (ret)
return ret;