Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation

[Marc Zyngier]

On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
> loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
> It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses" 
> instead
> of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
> aforementioned wording.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing
> identical callback
>  mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
>  handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
>
> -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
>  hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
>  be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
>  interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...