Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack
From: Yu, Yu-cheng
Date:  Tue Aug 25 2020 - 14:43:56 EST
On 8/24/2020 5:36 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 5:30 PM Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_MMAP_SHSTK, u64 *args)
     Allocate a new shadow stack.
     The parameter 'args' is a pointer to a user buffer.
     *args = desired size
     *(args + 1) = MAP_32BIT or MAP_POPULATE
     On returning, *args is the allocated shadow stack address.
This is hideous.  Would this be better as a new syscall?
Could you point out why this is hideous, so that I can modify the 
arch_prctl?
I think this is more arch-specific.  Even if it becomes a new syscall, 
we still need to pass the same parameters.
Yu-cheng