Re: [RFC v4 09/20] drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_has_mst()

[Jani Nikula]

On Tue, 25 Aug 2020, Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just a tiny drive-by cleanup, we can consolidate i915's code for
> checking for MST support into a helper to be shared across drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 18 ++----------------
>  include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h         | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 79c27f91f42c0..1e29d3a012856 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4699,20 +4699,6 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static bool
> -intel_dp_sink_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> -{
> -	u8 mstm_cap;
> -
> -	if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < 0x12)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	return mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP;
> -}
> -
>  static bool
>  intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> @@ -4720,7 +4706,7 @@ intel_dp_can_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  	return i915->params.enable_dp_mst &&
>  		intel_dp->can_mst &&
> -		intel_dp_sink_can_mst(intel_dp);
> +		drm_dp_has_mst(&intel_dp->aux, intel_dp->dpcd);
>  }
>  
>  static void
> @@ -4729,7 +4715,7 @@ intel_dp_configure_mst(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder =
>  		&dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base;
> -	bool sink_can_mst = intel_dp_sink_can_mst(intel_dp);
> +	bool sink_can_mst = drm_dp_has_mst(&intel_dp->aux, intel_dp->dpcd);
>  
>  	drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
>  		    "[ENCODER:%d:%s] MST support: port: %s, sink: %s, modparam: %s\n",
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> index 8b9eb4db3381c..2d8983a713e8c 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h
> @@ -911,4 +911,26 @@ __drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
>  	for ((__i) = 0; (__i) < (__state)->num_private_objs; (__i)++) \
>  		for_each_if(__drm_dp_mst_state_iter_get((__state), &(mgr), NULL, &(new_state), (__i)))
>  
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_has_mst() - check whether or not a sink supports MST
> + * @aux: The DP AUX channel to use
> + * @dpcd: A cached copy of the DPCD capabilities for this sink
> + *
> + * Returns: %True if the sink supports MST, %false otherwise
> + */
> +static inline bool

I've become more and more critical of accumulating a lot of inlines in
headers. Do we really want this in the header?

> +drm_dp_has_mst(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> +	       const u8 dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> +{
> +	u8 mstm_cap;
> +
> +	if (dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_12)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_MSTM_CAP, &mstm_cap) != 1)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return !!(mstm_cap & DP_MST_CAP);

The !! is superfluous.

BR,
Jani.

> +}
> +
>  #endif

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center