Re: [PATCH v36 12/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Wed Aug 26 2020 - 10:53:17 EST


On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:52:51PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> index 59472cd6a11d..35f713e3a267 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst
> @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ Code Seq# Include File Comments
> <mailto:tlewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 0xA3 90-9F linux/dtlk.h
> 0xA4 00-1F uapi/linux/tee.h Generic TEE subsystem
> +0xA4 00-1F uapi/asm/sgx.h Intel SGX subsystem (a legit conflict as TEE and SGX do not co-exist)

Again, maybe add <mailto:linux-sgx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ?

This is from a previous review - please be more careful when addressing
review comments - either do them or object to them but silently ignoring
them is not cool.

> 0xAA 00-3F linux/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h
> 0xAB 00-1F linux/nbd.h
> 0xAC 00-1F linux/raw.h
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3787d278e84b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) WITH Linux-syscall-note */

checkpatch is not happy about something:

WARNING: 'SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) WITH Linux-syscall-note */' is not supported in LICENSES/...
#79: FILE: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h:1:
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) WITH Linux-syscall-note */

...

> +/**
> + * sgx_ioc_enclave_create - handler for %SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_CREATE
> + * @filep: open file to /dev/sgx

Also from a previous review:

"That's

@encl: enclave pointer

or so."

> + * @arg: userspace pointer to a struct sgx_enclave_create instance
> + *
> + * Allocate kernel data structures for a new enclave and execute ECREATE after
> + * verifying the correctness of the provided SECS.
> + *
> + * Note, enforcement of restricted and disallowed attributes is deferred until
> + * sgx_ioc_enclave_init(), only the architectural correctness of the SECS is
> + * checked by sgx_ioc_enclave_create().

>From that same review:

"Well, I don't see that checking. Where is it?"

Ok, I'm going to stop here. Please go over v33's review and either
address *all* feedback or incorporate it into your patches if you agree
with it but do not silently ignore it. One of the things I very strongly
detest is ignored review comments.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette