Re: [PATCH v2] HID: google: add google vivaldi HID driver

[Sean O'Brien]

> I actually believe we should follow the standard convention here, and have
> just one hid-<vendor> driver for all google products. Currently we have
> hid-google-hammer, and this would add hid-google-vivaldi. Would you (or
> Wei-Ning, CCing here) object on merging these two together?

I'm a bit reluctant to merge them.  Partly because I'm not familiar with
the hid-google-hammer driver, but mostly because this driver is intended
to handle non-google products which will use a google-defined usage code.
Perhaps I should drop "google" from the driver name?

Thanks,
Sean O'Brien