Re: [PATCH] compiler-clang: add build check for clang 10.0.1

[Sedat Dilek]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:14 PM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> During Plumbers 2020, we voted to just support the latest release of
> Clang for now.  Add a compile time check for this.
>
> Older clang's may work, but we will likely drop workarounds for older
> versions.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/9
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/941
> Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Nice to see This Is Happening!

See also my other replies to Kees and Nathan comments.

Acked-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>

- Sedat -

> ---
>  include/linux/compiler-clang.h | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> index cee0c728d39a..7338d3ffd240 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
>  #error "Please don't include <linux/compiler-clang.h> directly, include <linux/compiler.h> instead."
>  #endif
>
> +#define CLANG_VERSION (__clang_major__ * 10000 \
> +                    + __clang_minor__ * 100    \
> +                    + __clang_patchlevel__)
> +
> +#if CLANG_VERSION < 100001
> +# error Sorry, your compiler is too old - please upgrade it.
> +#endif
> +
>  /* Compiler specific definitions for Clang compiler */
>
>  /* same as gcc, this was present in clang-2.6 so we can assume it works
> --
> 2.28.0.297.g1956fa8f8d-goog
>