Re: [GIT PULL] USB fixes for 5.9-rc3

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 17:03, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 26.08.2020 15:43, Greg KH wrote:
> > The following changes since commit 9123e3a74ec7b934a4a099e98af6a61c2f80bbf5:
> >
> >    Linux 5.9-rc1 (2020-08-16 13:04:57 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git tags/usb-5.9-rc3
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 23e26d0577535f5ffe4ff8ed6d06e009553c0bca:
> >
> >    usb: typec: tcpm: Fix Fix source hard reset response for TDA 2.3.1.1 and TDA 2.3.1.2 failures (2020-08-25 16:02:35 +0200)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > USB fixes for 5.9-rc3
> >
> > Here are a small set of USB fixes for 5.9-rc3.
> >
> > Like most set of USB bugfixes, they include the usual:
> >       - usb gadget driver fixes
> >       - xhci driver fixes
> >       - typec fixes
> >       - new qurks and ids
> >       - fixes for USB patches merged in 5.9-rc1
> >
> > Nothing huge, all of these have been in linux-next with no reported
> > issues:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Alan Stern (1):
> >        USB: yurex: Fix bad gfp argument
> >
> > Andy Shevchenko (1):
> >        usb: hcd: Fix use after free in usb_hcd_pci_remove()
> >
> > Badhri Jagan Sridharan (1):
> >        usb: typec: tcpm: Fix Fix source hard reset response for TDA 2.3.1.1 and TDA 2.3.1.2 failures
> >
> > Bastien Nocera (2):
> >        USB: Also match device drivers using the ->match vfunc
> >        USB: Fix device driver race
> >
> > Brooke Basile (2):
> >        USB: gadget: u_f: add overflow checks to VLA macros
>
> Sorry, but the above patch breaks USB Ethernet Gadget operation. It also
> didn't get the proper testing in linux-next (next-20200826 is the first
> one with this patch).
>

Hi Greg,

I have a different question - why is this patch not findable on any
LKML lists? lore.kernel.org does not have it. Neither has mine inbox
tracking most of the lists (also main linux-kernel). Maybe subject
changed?

Do we have another process of sending patches for fast inclusion in
the Linux kernel? Is addressing a HW vulnerability?

Best regards,
Krzysztof